User talk:SanjayMohan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Saraswati-boundary-between-India-Savages.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Saraswati-boundary-between-India-Savages.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "Removed Vandalism" at Khatri article????
You are not citing any sources before making these changes on the article. Cite them before you make the changes again. Its time this article was referred to an admin for proving some edit protection.
Unitedroad 07:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Plz help
Help fight vandals on khatri page
[edit] Bad taste
Your anti Hindu Khatri comments put in the Khatri article are extremely POV and not fact based. Please avoid comments on a community. Haphar 19:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sources must be cited - especially for potentially defamatory statements
As a critic who Deepak Chopra sued (unsuccessfully) for $194 million, I am certainly no defender of this slick guru. So believe me when I say the unsourced and extremely derogatory statements you added to the Chopra article are unacceptable according to Wiki policies and guidelines. While I may share some of your opinions of Chopra, as editors neither your opinion nor mine belong in a Wikipedia article.Askolnick 13:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding Mauryan Empire and Ashoka Page
Hello SanjayMohan,
In case you haven't viewed it recently, I just wanted to bring your attention to the Mauryan Empire and Ashoka pages. I know you've had discussion with PHG before about point of view, and my concern is that the Tarn theory he cites about Ashoka being descended from Seleucids, gives users the wrong impression. I very much respect your effort to defend accuracy on the Chandragupta page, which is why I approached you. I would appreciate it if you took a look at it and the discussion page, and let me know what you think. If you feel so inclined, your support would also be appreciated. Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Devanampriya
