User talk:SandBoxer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, SandBoxer, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

-Poli (talk • contribs) 06:49, 2005 July 27 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

I second Poli's welcome, but I'm gonna do so without the Template. :P I see you've taken an interest in editting the Neopets article. That's great! It could be expanded infinitely. I hope some of the sections get their own articles soon. The Neopets article also gets vandalized a lot, so be on the lookout for anons and sockpuppets trying to destroy our work! Take care now. Ryan 08:03, July 27, 2005 (UTC) P.S. I don't like my talk page being so empty. Feel free to leave me a message anytime!

[edit] Tykell

My bad. I was aware of the fact that he had cleaned his discussion page, but I somehow missed that he had warning templates on there. His constant violations of WP:CIVIL (even after being warned) do justify a block, I'd say. -- SoothingR(pour) 09:04, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] AFD

While this AfD was closed a couple of weeks ago, I'm asking for a bit of clarification. Do votes to disambiguate the page count as keep votes? As here I noticed there were only Deletes, Disambiguate, and a Transwiki vote yet it was closed as no concensus. The article has improved a lot since being nominated on Articles for Deletion however. Thanks. SandBoxer 06:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. The purpose of AFD discussions is to decide whether an article should be kept or deleted. While recommending the transwikification of an article implies deletion, everything else is considered a recommendation to keep unless specifically mentioned otherwise. What actually comes of an article after that is generally discussed on the article's talk page. Stifle (talk) 11:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ackermann function

On the 8th May, you changed the format of a couple of formulae in the table, removing the f(2,(n+3)) ness of the formulae. Your comment was "Is there a reason for "N+3"ness. The Ackermann function formulae have a pattern involving successively greater powers of 2 to some function of "n+3" - it is clear if you progress to greater "M". The formulae you removed carried this scheme backwards to smaller "m".

I am inclined to put the formulae back. Before I do so, do you wish to comment? -- SGBailey 09:12, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: AfD

Hi SandBoxer. Since it's been five days, I've closed the discussion as keep and transcluded it in the log. Thanks, Sango123 15:29, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: SP episodes

Alrite thanks fool. I'll be lookin forward to October. User:Slapslapslap

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/a/n/User_talk%7ESandBoxer_f6f2.html"