Talk:Santa Rosa, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] New updates 2/07

I've started updating the SR page as my time allows. I see that most of the discussion here is pretty old. I just noted below that the main defect of this page is that it has very little content so far. I'm going to try to add some brief, pertinent sections to get the ball rolling.

For the record, I'm semi-retired at 65, and I've lived in Santa Rosa most of my life since 1952. I've been closely studying the economic/political/social scene in SR and Sonoma County since the late '80s, and I'm pretty well informed about local government and politics.

Mukrkrgsj 06:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Here are a couple more tidbits that you might want to mention:

  • The "Peanuts on Parade" program, where they display (and eventually auction off) various Peanuts-related statues around town. Unfortunately, this is the last year they're having it, and so it may be of limited value to wikipedia. This year's theme is "Joe Cool". You might also want to mention that a few of the previous years' statues are still publicly viewable, being scattered around Santa Rosa (but are subject to be moved, as they are now privately owned). Reference: http://ci.santa-rosa.ca.us/default.aspx?PageId=1202

Darryl 04:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

True, the PoP program is a temporary business promotion. I think Schulz would be disturbed to see his children letting SR use his characters in ways he never permitted himself. Likewise, I doubt the Downtown wifi access is significant enough to mention. Of course, anyone can add whatever they please to this page at any time. -- Mukrkrgsj 09:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Birth place of Fictional Philip Marlowe

In a published letter to D. J. Ibberson 19-Apr-1951, Raymond Chandler identifies Santa Rosa ,California, as the birth place (and we assume childhood home) of his famous fictional creation Philip Marlowe. From the letter is appears this may be in homage to the Hitchcock film 'Shadow of a Doubt'.

See Raymond Chandler, 'Novels and Other Writing' (The Library of America, 1995, IBN 1-883011-08-6)

That seems worth including on the Santa Rosa page - but where? Is he a famous resident - albeit fictional?

--Dan Allen 17:27, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Why not? Do it!

[edit] Santa Rosa Press Democrat

Any thought about adding information about the PD? It's a major influence in the northbay, and a major paper in the Bay Area as a whole -Anoymous 21:34, Jul 6, 2005 (UTC)

I think the Press Democrat could be a deserving topic, but for a standalone page (or perhaps the county page?). As you note, it's not a topic limited to the town of Santa Rosa. Cate8 July 8, 2005 17:58 (UTC)
I just created a Business&Industry/Media subsection, and began an entry re the PD. The PD is a major northern California paper, and I agree it should have its own page as well. Mukrkrgsj Feb 25, 2007

[edit] William Mark Felt

Why so much information about William Mark Felt that has nothing to do with Santa Rosa? This duplicates info better placed elsewhere, and is a distraction in this article. -Willmcw 15:38, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lists of Wineries

Those lists are in terrible style, and should really be moved to something like a List of wineries in Santa Rosa, California. Falcon 04:17, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Separately, the use of Santa Rosa as a filming location is interesting, but that list seems to have many details which are irrelevant to Santa Rosa. Would anyone mind if we cut out the details, like the cast? These films almost all have articles of their own, so most of this info is duplicated elsewhere. Cheers, -Willmcw 05:49, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

OK, I did a lot of cleanup. Now done. — Stevey7788 (talk) 02:48, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Running Fence

Why is the "Running Fence" listed on Santa Rosa's page? This seems appropriate for the Sonoma County and Marin County pages. However, did it even enter the Santa Rosa city limits or otherwise have a clear connection to the city? Cate8 19:28, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Santa Rosa films vs. Sonoma County films

Why list so many films that have no association with the city of Santa Rosa? Being filmed in Bodega Bay or Cloverdale, etc. makes them perhaps worth mention on the respective cities' pages but not here. Conflating Santa Rosa with the county-at-large is just confusing and distracting.

It used to be worse. If you're interested, it would be helpful to move the non-Santa Rosa films to the county article. Cheers, -Willmcw 02:47, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)


Good work. The article is much easier to read now, and contains the information that is most relevant to the subject of the article. Cheers, -Willmcw 10:54, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Film appearance trivia

"Mr. Fox, a Fairfield, CA high school teacher claimed to have a short scene in the movie" (The Candidate) seems a bit far afield from the main topic. An unsubstantiated claim that a random person might have appeared in an unspecified scene--not obvious how this contributes to the body of human knowledge about Santa Rosa. Perhaps if there were some context added...? Otherwise, the sentence seems a good candidate for deletion. -Cate8 05:19, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

I'd assume that many locals have appeared as extras. In any case, this mention seems neither notable nor even verifiable (IMDB doesn't list anyone named "Fox" in the cast list of the movie). Pull it. -Willmcw 05:50, July 15, 2005 (UTC)


Pulled. If relevance to the main Santa Rosa is ever established, the line is preserved here and in the page history. -Cate8 06:48, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] better lead pic?

cant we come up with a better lead picture? cherry street historic neighborhood? vineyard by john ash restaurant? schultz museum? the luther burbank house might do well in a different light or angle, but this doesnt seem lead quality as it is. sincerely Anlace 04:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

No argument from me—but, I think a vineyard should lead and it's the wrong time of year (I was waiting until bloom to get that snap). The Schulz Museum is notable, but not a lead either. Any other suggestions? RadioKirk talk to me 04:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
ok by me to wait for vineyard in leaf for lead...the article could actually use two or three more pics...the river park behind the hyatt hotel (whats it called prince edward greenway?) is not bad, but i shot it at the wrong light. will keep looking ...the stone office bldg in railroad sq is not bad either but im not sure rr sq is worth two pics...thanks for your feedback radiokirk, regards Anlace 05:00, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
I honestly don't think the article is ready for any more pics as it is now. Presuming someone takes on the task of working this to WP:FA status (I might, eventually), then, certainly. Also, I thought about the Prince Memorial Greenway while snapping Burbank H&G, but I rejected it as being of insufficient notability (if I were a tourist, that would be way down on my list). Heck, I know where Mark Felt lives, and I wouldn't snap that, either [grin]. Seriously, though, I'd already thought about dumping the LB home (the gardens are the draw, really) in favor of the Schulz Museum as a lead until the cabernet is in bloom (and, Vintners Inn is technically outside Santa Rosa—then again, the hillside vineyard on Old Red north of Fountain Grove is technically outside city limits, but I think it would take a more dramatic shot). Anyway, I'm rambling—any more thoughts?
Edit: Also, I'm inclined to purge "looking east" again—is that really relevant?RadioKirk talk to me 05:16, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
its fine to take out the "looking east". i had misunderstood you (i thought something freaky happened when we were both editing at the same time. now i see you meant to take out the "looking east" bit.) i dont think it hurts to have a shot of a vineyard right over the city limit line. i think im in sync with you on all the other points. ill sneak in a few shots of santa rosa in other articles :) and leave alone adding any more to santa rosa for now, best regards Anlace 06:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Sounds good. BTW, something freaky did happen; I intended to take out "looking north" the first time because it was incorrect. Having a direction in there at all struck me later as extraneous. :) RadioKirk talk to me 16:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Okay, snap of CMSM now leads. I took several snaps, choosing the W. Steele Ln. view for two main reasons: one, this is the view tourists and locals usually see first (most people will approach from W. Steele, and not down Hardies Ln.); two, even with the painted Charlie Brown and Snoopy statuettes, the front entrance is surprisingly boring and devoid of color. It might be better in the summer, though... RadioKirk talk to me 19:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

the existing map/template seems a weak lead image. One of the others could be promoted, or also see the images in Santa Rosa Creek. What do others think? regards. Anlace 01:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sonoma State

I took out Sonoma State University from under the list of education institutes. Sonoma State is not in Santa Rosa, so it doesn't belong on the Santa Rosa page, even if it is noted as being in Rohnert Park. They are two seperate cities, so vital facts about one should not be on the page of the other. -- Lauren H.

[edit] Moving of Pictures?

I don't think that the couple of pictures should of been moved down to the bottom. I realize that they might go better at their new position, but the article now looks distored, so I believe that the pictures should be moved back up to their normal positions. What does everyone else think? Chickyfuzz(user talk) 05:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I moved the pictures to get them out of the way of the current and new text. In my opinion, the shot of the Schulz Museum is too large, and none of the photos are especially pertinent or interesting. But the fundamental problem is a lack of text. The photos won't stick out so much if we create enough text to put them in balance. Mukrkrgsj 06:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/a/n/Talk%7ESanta_Rosa%2C_California_1b24.html"