Talk:Santa Barbara News-Press controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think the `proseline' criticism is no longer valid. Of course, the Didionesque list will be objectionable to some, and I'd prefer to make a nice table/list out of that, but I don't have the time. So the article could use more editing, but I think it is above the median for Wiki... snug 13:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

With not a single heading, this article is an unreadable unencyclopedic mess, far below the WP median. -- Jibal 21:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

OK... thanks for the observation snug 02:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I organized the info into headings... that is a significant improvement. I think it could still be made better, but I do think it is above the median now. snug 19:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References

I think when you have 30 or so references in a row, we really needs to reevaluate some things. --waffle iron ^talk 05:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)