User talk:SamBlob
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers such as yourself:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nice with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — MATHWIZ2020 TALK | CONTRIBS 20:48, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Guitarists
Saw your contributions to the Les Paul pages. Would you be interested in joining the WikiProject Guitarists? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving articles related to guitars, guitarists (including bass/bassists) We could certainly use another editor to help out. Cheers and take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 19:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Albert Lee
Good Job, SamBlob! Best wishes, Lion King 19:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you! Respectfully, SamBlob 19:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Black Beauty
Was it you that made the comment that the Black Beauty article should be re-named to the proper "Custom" title? I am thinking that now would be a good time to do that. Thoughts? Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 13:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC) I think the "proper" name would be better for the article. Also, Wiki-commons has a higher quality pic of a Studio model over what's currently available in the article - [Image:Gibson Les Paul Studio c.jpg]. A better promo pic from Gibson.com would be even better but I am not sure how it'll meet WP:FU since an obvious "free" version is available. Good work on all the Gibson articles! Take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 13:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Heritage Guitars
Good work on this article! We might just save it yet. :) Bubba hotep 23:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you! I hope we can! The article for Guild was just as bad. Respectfully, SamBlob 00:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- I apologize for having failed to reply sooner to your query apropos of the deletion review undertaken relative to Heritage Guitars; the issue, I regret to say, simply slipped my mind. In any event, the discussion endorsed the closure of the AfD as keep (or, perhaps more accurately, no consensus to delete), with the provision that a second AfD might be essayed in the future should no further substantial works of which the company is a principal subject be presented (there is, as you will recall, some disagreement regarding how the multiple non-trivial works criterion of WP:CORP is to be construed). I'll surely alert you should I encounter a second AfD, but you might also do well to watchlist Heritage Guitars in order that you might partake of such discussion. Once more, I'm altogether sorry for the belated nature of my reply; should you have any further questions, you should, of course, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. Cheers, Joe 06:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. Will comply. I have put it on my watchlist now. Respectfully, SamBlob 16:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- I apologize for having failed to reply sooner to your query apropos of the deletion review undertaken relative to Heritage Guitars; the issue, I regret to say, simply slipped my mind. In any event, the discussion endorsed the closure of the AfD as keep (or, perhaps more accurately, no consensus to delete), with the provision that a second AfD might be essayed in the future should no further substantial works of which the company is a principal subject be presented (there is, as you will recall, some disagreement regarding how the multiple non-trivial works criterion of WP:CORP is to be construed). I'll surely alert you should I encounter a second AfD, but you might also do well to watchlist Heritage Guitars in order that you might partake of such discussion. Once more, I'm altogether sorry for the belated nature of my reply; should you have any further questions, you should, of course, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. Cheers, Joe 06:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
--Carabinieri 11:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Gibson Blackbird
Nice work on merging the Gibson Blackbird article into the Gibson Thunderbird article. Very professional, in my opinion. Very nice work. I'm glad I noticed you did that. I'll have to think about that if I ever make a new guitar-related article, whether or not it should get it's own article or be incorporated into another. Thank you. I might be reading some other articles of yours to help me more to become a better wikipedian, as well. Bsroiaadn 12:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Apologies from CS
I apologize I didn't mean to vandalize in any way —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Commiessuck (talk • contribs) 21:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC).