Talk:Samurang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 16/3/2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

	WikiProject Korea invites you to join in improving Wikipedia articles related to Korea. Community: Discussion - Notice board Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventions Navigation: Key topics - Browse - Portal
	This article: Start quality.
Korea-related tasks: edit refresh Collaboration of the month Create articles Cleanup articles Assess articles Add Korean text Maintain unstable articles Discuss articles for deletion Improve A-class articles Improve B-class articles Improve Start-class articles Improve D-class articles Improve Stub-class articles Improve top priority articles Improve high priority articles Improve medium priority articles Improve low priority articles Improve very low priority articles Articles to work on: Goguryeo, achieve consensus and neutral point of view. 2007-03-16 Tteok, expand. 2007-03-16 Jeongol (전골), create. 2007-03-16 Science and technology in Korea, create. 2007-03-17 Comfort women, achieve stability. 2007-3-29 Revised Romanization of Korean, include reasonably complete rule set. 2007-03-29

	This page is part of the Wikipedia Martial Arts Project. Please help ensure that it follows those guidelines as much as is reasonable; if you do not agree with those guidelines, please help us improve them!	Chinese Manual of Style - Naming conventions Indic Manual of Style - Naming conventions Japanese Manual of Style Korean Manual of Style - Naming conventions
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

SpiralKnot's edit [1] is inappropriate because it misleads readers into believing that only the etymology is wrong and that the Samurang did exist. --Nanshu 00:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Samurang myth was created sometimes in 80s or 90s. This is totally fabrication.Haidong Gumdo was also created in 80s--Hskf4 05:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

I have added the claim regarding the origins of the samurai again. Readers should be aware that the claim has been made by Haidong Kumdo organizations to know what the whole controversy is about. I am not adding this to further the fabrication, I merely point out its existence. The falsity of this claim as well as the dubious nature the existance of the samurang have been explained at length in the article. SpiralKnot 11:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)