Talk:Sa'dah conflict

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove |auto=yes from this template. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the |class= parameter in this template and removing the stub template from the article. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

[edit] Partial reversion of edit by User:KazakhPol

I partially reverted the edit by User:KazakhPol (see diff). Here are the parts I reverted and my reasons for doing so:

1. Vertical vs. horizontal listing of {{cite news}}. I prefer vertical listing as I find it easier to edit (you do not become lost in a sea of url's and article titles. See, for example, how hard to read/edit the article 2006 Digampathana truck bombing while the references where still horizontal (look at the red-highlighted text on the left side).
2. I do not know if there is a difference between <references/> and {{reflist}}, but I have seen the former far more times than the latter. If the latter is a new and better format that is gradually replacing the former, then I apologize for my reversion.
3. Link: singular or plural - I think it is a WP style guideline to have External links (plural) even if there is just one link (as more may be added). I once ran across the userpage of a bot and one of its functions was to replace section header "External link" with "External links" (and "Reference" with "References").
4. I have again categorized the article into Category:Wars involving Yemen as it may violate WP:NPOV to just classify in the "Terrorism in Yemen" category. However, for ease of navigation, I have not removed the article's categorization in Category:Terrorism in Yemen.

If you disagree with these reversions or I made a reversion in error (especially possible in the cases of #2), please reinstate your edits (please do not simply revert my edits as I have made some other changes as well) or comment here. Cheers, Black Falcon 04:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)