Talk:S corporation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Tax related articles to a feature-quality standard. |
hello ı am a student ın T.R.N.C. I want to ask a questıon what ıs the benefits of small busıness? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.175.149.55 (talk • contribs). on 28 December 2005.
It is my understanding that an S-corporation can have no more than 75 shareholders —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.205.120.103 (talk • contribs). on 21 May 2006.
100 or more is past the limit —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.98.164.140 (talk • contribs). on 6 July 2006.
You should take an English or Grammer class. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 170.146.91.6 (talk • contribs). on 11 September 2006.
The limit used to be 75, however, recently, this was changed to 100.
Maybe you should take a class as well. First, the correct spelling is grammar, not grammer. Second, your sentence structure should read:
"The limit used to be 75, however, this was recently changed to 100." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.123.228.107 (talk • contribs). on 26 December 2006.
[edit] LLCs
Shouldn't the intro be modified to make clear not all LLCs are S corps? How's this language, "An S corporation or S-corp is a corporation, some limited liability companies, or other ..." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Have Gun, Will Travel (talk • contribs) 19:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC).
-
- Actually, I would argue that the language is merely listing the kinds of entities that could elect to be S corps. Maybe we can come up with some kind of language that makes clear that many LLCs are treated as partnerships for Federal income tax purposes. Stay tuned. Yours, Famspear 19:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
