Talk:RPGds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

By the page content author:

[edit] Lack of Notability

This is a pilot discussion on the Notability of RPGds, as software. Currently, the criteria for the notability of software is still under heavy discussion.

RPGds is good to discuss, in respects to notability.

For this reason, I propose that this article be deleted upon the grounds of not being notable. However, I propose that this be discussed, prior to any action being taken.

[edit] Article Credibility

Information is hard to verify for this software, due to a lack of published works that reference it. However, notability and verification of reliability cannot be judged by appealing to published works (there simply are not enough magazines, books, and journals to cover ALL software). Therefore, due to a lack of verifiable information, I also propose the deletion of this article.

Notability policies need to be finalized as soon as possible.

[edit] Grounds for Deletion

• Not notable (according to current rough notability policy guidelines)
• Information is not verifiable in reliable, published works

Thank you for your consideration of my proposal...

StudiosusTheologiae 19:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

How can information be difficult to verify when the software is easily downloaded from the referenced homepage?

The home page doesn't really supply detailed specifications from what I have seen. Often, third party references will be privy to some of this information. I'd say that the information not being verifiable in third party resources is a pain, as long as the primary sources or 1st party sources are good. The notability aspect is much harder to decide!!!