User talk:Royalhistorian
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] 
Welcome, Royalhistorian!
Hello, Royalhistorian, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Clamster5, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- Image:Crystal 128 ksmiletris.png The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Fun stuff...
{{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome![edit] Matthew Lyle Spencer
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Matthew Lyle Spencer, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://users.panola.com/AAGHS/ARTICLES/SPENCER.html. As a copyright violation, Matthew Lyle Spencer appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Matthew Lyle Spencer has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Matthew Lyle Spencer. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Matthew Lyle Spencer, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Daniel.Bryant 09:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Spiritualism
Hi Carl, I'm glad you are interested in contributing to Spiritualism. So far, you've restricted yourself to inserting your own articles into the references. I hope you are willing to do a bit more. Why don't you actualy write text, letting your articles serve as the sources for the text. Otherwise, you know, it just seems like shameless self promotion to place your own articles in the references when there are thousands of other equally deserving articles that could have been placed there. Thanks. Anthon.Eff 03:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
