Talk:Royal League
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Royal League falls within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a project to create and improve Denmark-related Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, all interested editors are welcome! |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ). (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Norway, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Norway. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
The article on Royal League is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of football (soccer) related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] "participations"
From the article:
- "(...)have not yet founded their participations."
- "The twelve participation teams(...)"
Is this correct English? I'm not a native speaker of it, but isn't "participating teams" or "competitors" (in this case, at lease) more common. As far as I know, participation is more used as the participation itself, as "to take part of", "to participate in", right? But then again, I could be wrong - I've been before :) /AB-me 11:10, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Yes. Thanks for spotting it. Should be better now. Shanes 11:38, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Part of the Scandinavia-series
Does this article fit into that series? No doubt about it's Scandinavian relations, but the template seems more history-related to me. Note: It doesn't even link to the four countries, just the history of them. /AB-me (chit-chat) 17:39, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
