Talk:Roger W. Moss, Jr.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Planning Portal This article covers subjects of relevance to WikiProject Urban studies and planning, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the WikiProject: Urban studies and planning, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. You may also be interested in contributing to the Portal:Planning
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Back off, Toasty. I'm getting a little cranky. --Mothperson 20:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What is this "(preservationists)" crap, and "alleged"'s??? Suddenly it's a crime to be a well-known? Or to be called well-known when one is but the person using the word "alleged" doesn't like you? Or to be called a well-known preservationist when one actually is, but a person exists in the world who doesn't agree with one's beliefs? Jeezum crow, Toasty. Why don't you go make trouble in the all-so-important world of Wikipedia articles on New York television news - boy, there's a significant topic, or license plate collections, or the Jackie Gleason Bus Stop and give this one up, because YOU. WILL. NOT. WIN. HERE. I PROMISE. Go rewrite that ghastly stub about Frank Field (meteorologist) ("I think he's a medical doctor"). You've got soooo many stubs that need work. Get busy. Lazy lazy socks. Haven't read one substantive thing by you yet. --Mothperson 20:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bloody Americans!

I go look up Roger Moss and I find a bloody American! This whole thing is getting to damn Ameri-centric. I look at the history and I see that there was a page that gave an option for the American and the Welsh sculptor and it was removed. Typical American nonsense they thing they can control everything. Some bloody international encylopedia! Ameri-CentricPatrol 30 June 2005 13:29 (UTC)

Those who don't read article history are condemned to - uh, I guess have apoplexy. --Mothperson 30 June 2005 13:51 (UTC)

[edit] POV - This gentelman seems to be rather disputed

This gentelman seems to be cause of great dispute, and the article seems to be slanted more in favour of Mr. Moss. Frühstücksdienst 19:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC)