User talk:Rodrigo Cornejo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Hello people

Feel free to orient me on wikipedia usage, I'm so sorry, I'm a newbie, don't get aggravated if I make stupid mistakes, I am all ears and willing to learn how to contribute without doing any mistakes ;) Sorry about the tag stuff, it won't happen again

Welcome!

Hello, Rodrigo Cornejo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Melchoir 21:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] World (philosophy)

I will let you know since you did not view the article's history that placing a name tag at Wikipedia is not acceptaple as per Wikipedia's standards and it should not be placed there again.Aey 00:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Userboxes

The American English userbox is {{user AmE-N}}. Wikipedia:Userboxes has lots of userboxes for you to choose from if you'd like. If you go to my userpage and click "Edit this page", you can see the code for my userpage (and how I have my userboxes set up.) Enjoy! Grandmasterka 00:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] North America (Americas) delete review

Thanks for voting and expressing your opinion about the article North America (Americas). As you know the debate was closed, and the result was "to delete it". Since I, as the creator of the article, thought the decision was hasty and wrong, I opened a to review the deletion.

This mean that administrators and regular editors can vote again and, most importantly, argument why the decision was wrong or right. Please, take a look at this and express your opinion:

Thanks for your time reading this message. AlexCovarrubias ( Let's talk! ) 22:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zionism as settler colonialsm?

Zionism was a return to the homeland of the Jews in a response to anti-Semitism. I see you are Mexican. If the Aztecs were exiled from Mexico, and were oppressed for thousands of years...in say Brazil, and then experienced Genocide, would they not deserve to return to Mexico? As a sidenote, please stop using unreliable sources. Follow Wikipedia:Reliable sources, thank you!--Urthogie 10:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

If you look back at most of my edits, you'll find the majority of them are actually for music--specifically hip hop pages--like rapping. I actually recently started heavily editing Israel pages because I feel there is a system bias against both Israel and Islam here, coming from different sectors respectively.
Your see also links were in violation of Wikipedia:UNDUE. One source does not establish such a radical and contested connection. What if a reliable source calls a Mexican president a nazi? Can we add a see also to Nazism? No, of course not, one such reliable source is not enough for such a radical addition.--Urthogie 01:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hannah Frudden

No, I can't delete it, but I marked it for speedy deletion and it should be deleted relatively quickly. You can always tag a page yourself for speedy deletion by using one of the template available through WP:SPEEDY. Lcarscad 21:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Settler colonialism

Rodrigo,

Please don't be discouraged and I don't think anyone intended to frustrate you. Of course you can make valuable contributions to this encyclopaedia.

fwiw, Humus Sapiens did not contact me on this article, but I do watch the contributions of several dozen editors who edit in areas of interest to me and this article caught my attention.

I saw some original research being added and responded. I didn't see that the sources backed up the idea of Israel being an example of "settler colonialism". I'm wondering whether the content of the article in general (the other sections) would be more appropriate in the Colonialism article?

Meanwhile, please don't be upset, and I apologize if I came across bitchy. --MPerel ( talk | contrib) 01:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

On first glance (google), the idea of "settler colonialism" appears to be a legitimate topic and perhaps warrants an article. It just needs better sourcing from reliable sources (or I suppose the new merged policy is more accurately called attribution). The article needs to reflect what the sources say. I'm not in a hurry to delete the article. I do think it's improvable. --MPerel ( talk | contrib) 02:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, the article needs to make clear that it's mainly used amongst Left Wing sources for example, rather than stating their claims as fact, but rather just quoting them.--Urthogie 02:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your signature

You should maybe change your signature to "The original Mr. Orange" instead of "Teh original Mr. Orange", based on the correct spelling of the word the. YechielMan 03:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

  • In your response, you wrote, "And also, sorry for whatever I did, I don't want any more trouble with jewish users, ok?" I wish you would have just said "I like my signature the way it is" and left it at that. You didn't do anything wrong to me, but you were wrong to imply that "jewish users" give you trouble. Please be more careful with the words you use. YechielMan 03:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, I forgive you, it was an obvious misunderstanding. Let's end the discussion here. YechielMan 03:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/o/d/User_talk%7ERodrigo_Cornejo_0acb.html"