User talk:Rockstar915

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader

I corrected the formatting on your AfD for you. I also added it to the deletion log. If you need any assistance with anything else, please don't hesitate to ask. IrishGuy talk 05:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Too late! Looks like it already got speedied anyway... thanks for the help though! Rockstar915 05:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] On the removal of {{prod}} tags

Hi, The removal of {{prod}} tags from articles, even by their creators, is not vandalism (see Wikipedia:Proposed deletion#Conflicts). If you still belive the article deserves deletion, you may list it at AfD. -- Black Falcon 00:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Sorry, I was just a bit confused... another editor told me earlier that only the person who added the {{prod}} tags could remove them. But thanks for clearing up the confusion! Rockstar915 05:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dolla Billz

Socks blocked. Deiz talk 02:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

I've protected Cassie Whatshername and blocked a few more socks.. give me a shout if you need more admin help here. Deiz talk 05:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
You're probably right, although given the absence of any clear vandalism I'm slightly reluctant to block outright. I don't have access to checkuser or other high-level tools, so I can't be sure. Their recent edits seem to include some non-free image uploads and useless chuff about mixtapes and future releases. Be bold in removing anything unencylopedic and contact me if something needs to be done, eg further protections. You could also report the matter to WP:AIV or WP:ANI if you want other admins to check things out. Deiz talk 06:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] McCarthy Trenching

I know nothing about them, but they may be a good band - even notable. But "an article that fails to assert that the subject of the article is notable can be speedily deleted". The article merely states their name and who they're signed with - it makes no reference to why they're notable.

If you'd like to contest the speedy delete, please read the box on the page.

Thanks - and happy editing! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 06:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

  • I usually tag bands that haven't had any releases yet, and I had no idea who that guy was. I noted in the article the Bright Eyes connection. That might save others from tagging it. Terrible name, btw. (The band, not you.) Take care! --Butseriouslyfolks 06:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm with you on the band name! Rockstar915 06:43, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Gotcha. Sounds good. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 06:47, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
You might want to find a reference to them from a reliable source - just to be clear on their notability. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 06:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
You got it! Rockstar915 09:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] howdy

who are you? (if you don't mind my asking) are you who i think you are? Benito Crawford 15:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

ok, then, maybe you're not. i'm a duke graduate student in the music dept.
so how do you know the nein? do you know one of them?
...happen to be finn's roommate —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benitoelbonito (talkcontribs) 02:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Interpol

yeah... I guess your right... I went ahead and deleted the article

darn, your fast!

I had the double-headed disadvantage of being both new to Wiki and really really tired... but yes, after reviewing the Wikipedia rules in a nutshell, I found that it really didn't work here...

but that was a good article, at least... I mean, you have to admit :-p

sorry for the trouble... I'm 100 percent behind the user-moderated code of honor, and I'm rather embarassed for crossing it but... yeah... not enough sleep

[edit] AFD Grihasoft

Not a problem. Its definitely an article that should be speedy deleted, but if an editor keeps removing the db tag its easier to afd it so that you dont have to worry about monitoring the article since there is a record elsewhere of it being nominated for deletion. Happy editing. Ocatecir Talk 06:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jackie Chiles Law Society

Thank you for nominating Jackie Chiles Law Society for speedy deletion. I have reviewed the article, and although your suggestion to speedy it was a reasonable one, the creator has sufficiently argued notability on the talkpage that I have declined deletion at this time. You are free to nominate this article at articles for deletion, although it would be courteous to allow the creator a few days to improve the article first. Regards, Newyorkbrad 23:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)