User talk:Robin Hood
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Archives
Contents |
[edit] Please see
Image talk:Slavic languages.jpg#Some issues with the map. Thanks! Todor→Bozhinov 10:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Stub templates
This category existed before some time but was found duplicate of Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types and therefore deleted. I was doing the same categorisation in bg.wikipedia.org but then saw the outcome. --Петър Петров 18:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- As above, it is redundant with that list. We do have set procedures for deltion review - please goto WP:DRV and list the page there. Thanks. Martinp23 20:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Picture of the Year 2006
I assert to be the same user as commons:User:The Saint. Robin des Bois ♘ ➳ ✉ 19:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Anaximander peer review
I noticed that you changed my bulletted list to a numbered list on the Anaximander peer review. Please don't change other people's comments! I specifically chose bullets because numbers imply a hierarchical ranking of concerns. See WP:Wikiquette - Though editing articles is acceptable (and, in fact, encouraged), editing the signed words of another editor on a Talk or other discussion page is generally not acceptable, as it can alter the intent or message of the original comment, misrepresenting the original editor's thoughts. Try to avoid editing another editor's comments unless absolutely necessary. Awadewit 23:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Anaximander
I notice that you've edited a few philosophy articles. Have you considered joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy? It is an effort to coordinate the work of Wikipedians who are knowledgeable about philosophy in an effort to improve the general quality and range of Wikipedia articles on philosophical topics.KSchutte 20:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] proofreading
- Hi, I got your message. You're exactly right--that is an important distinction. I'll change it back to "with" if you haven't already done so. Sorry for the mistake, and à plus... Psp 22:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Human sciences vs Humanities
Hello and thanks for your message. Please let me try to explain my move: Humanističke nauke is an exact equivalent to the English Humanities, in both the term and the meaning. This is to say that these two expressions correspond to the traditional Latin term of Studia humana and include arts and languages and the similar disciplines such as history and archaeology (but excluding sociology and political studies, for instance). The Human Sciences, on the other hand, is a concept of a rather more recent origin which, to the best of my knowledge, has not yet found its exact terminological match in Serbo-Croatian (my personal attempt at a translation would be, e.g., Nauke o čoveku or Antropološke nauke), and differs from the traditional studia humana in that it includes, e.g., anthropology, ethnology and sociology. My opinion is that the traditional concept of the Humanističke nauke (= Humanities) should be retained whilst also keeping an eye on the possibilities of introducing, in parallel, the other concept of Human Sciences if such would be the tendency in the development of Social Studies within the Serbo-Croatian speaking area. Please let me know your opinion on this. --Igorwindsor 19:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it was me who left that message on your French Wiki page, because for some reason I thought that was your "mother Wiki" :-) Seriously, though, I can't be registered on all Wikis, hence there is unfortunately no proper username signature of mine there, however the point of my message was hopefully conveyed: the sh.Wiki is still under development, and every contribution is very much appreciated, especially so by me if it is within my area of interest, even if it involves adding interwikis only! ;-)
-
- On the point of Humanities vs. Human sciences -- I agree with all you have written on my talk page. I never imagined my change would require so much follow-up discussion. Therefore, since, unfortunately, I don't have time for making substantial changes to en.Wiki, as sh.Wiki takes priority, I think that, a) from what you write, you have understood perfectly my point, and I am still of the opinion that the semantics connection between the Humanities and Humanističke nauke should remain (particularly as they are equivalent translations of Studia humana), but also that b) you are free to change the interwiki links back to as they were, if that's easier, as it is not such a big deal anyway. I just thought that the interwikis should be set appropriately, but of course nothing is perfect, and neither is Wikipedia. :-) Cheers! --Igorwindsor 21:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
