Talk:Roberto Fiore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article is part of WikiProject Fascism, an attempt to better organize and unify articles relating to the fascist ideology, its impact on history and present-day organizations closely linked to both of these (ideology and history). See project page, and discussion. This article may be listed on an index of fascist movements or people. Such listing may be controversial; feel free to contribute to discussions there. The presence of this Talk page-only template only implies that the subject is of interest to the associated WikiProject.

Explain to me how the following "anti-Fascist" links serve a purpose for Roberto Fioere's article? This is propaganda for Anti-Fascism on an article which IS about a Fascist. Sorry I'm deleting these links until someone can explain their relevance other than promoting a POV sentiment. Piecraft 01:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• I agree these links are biased and that their existence can be confusing and POV-promoting. However they contain (biased but) detailed information on the figure of Fiore. Even if these links were just libels, they have informative value for the very fact there is that opinion on Fiore. I welcome every neutral, pro-Fiore and even pro-Fascist link about him to be added: you're welcome to find them and post them. In the mean time I re-added the links to the article, better stating they are biased. --Cyclopia 16:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)