Talk:Robert Zajonc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
WikiProject on Psychology
Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, which collaborates on Psychology and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs.

I propose that this article also mentions the confluence theory of Zajonc and Markus (1975). This could be the basis of a wiki-link between this article and that on birth order, an article which could do with some amendment, updating and editing. A reciprocal wiki-link, if this information were added, would solve some of the concerns I have about the article on birth order. ACEO 20:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry, obscure sentence

the more likely they would be to recognise the object and must form their own attitude about the stimulus by thinking about it : this is a very confused sentence. Could someone clarify this ? --Anne97432 15:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)