Talk:Robert Hanssen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Crime This article is part of WikiProject Crime, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide on true crime and criminology-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
High This article is on a subject of High-importance for Crime-related articles.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Federal Bureau of Investigation Seal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject FBI.
Department of Justice Seal
B (Rating Comments: add/view)
This article has been rated as B-Class
High
This article has been rated as High-Importance


Contents

[edit] Page needs expansion

This page needs to be expanded. It doesn't say anything about how he was found out. It just jumps to the fact that he was spared the death penalty. --Vitamin D 01:54, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

What is up with the relationship with Freeh - was Freeh his Boss at the time?

Somewhere I have a copy of the original affidaivit prepared by the arresting officer. One aspect missing from the current state of the article is the lack of detail of how Hanssen hid information -- such as rewriting the floppy disk driver to hide information on an apparently empty diskette.

[edit] Errors/Ambiguities

This paragraph is factual, except for the sentence in the parenthesis, which states a fact and then follows with pure speculation:

"According to important federal court documents, Hanssen told his Moscow handlers that he read My Silent War, the autobiography of British intelligence mole Kim Philby, when he was 14, and came to think of Philby as a hero. (The book, however, was published in 1968, when Hanssen was 24. Not too much need be read into that inaccuracy; Hanssen did not want to give the Russians clues as to his identity, and might not have wanted them to realize that he was close to retirement age when he made that assertion.)"

"Hanssen did not want to give the Russians clues as to his identity" How do we know that? How do we know what he was thinking when he was engaged in his spying?

"...and might not have wanted them to realize that he was close to retirement age when he made that assertion.)" Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. Let's stick to facts and let the readers draw their own inferences.

Any thoughts? Mcattell 17:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Mcattell

I don't think the following sentence is accurate: "He switched to business after three years,[4] receiving an MBA in accounting." I am not sure that it is possible to earn an MBA degree in Accounting, as a Master's degree in Accounting is usually called an MAC.

There are a fair amount of grammatical and other errors in here. I don't think it quite merits a cleanup tag, but it should be dealt with. I've cleaned up whatever I found. Also, what is up with this quote, midway through the page?

...associated with SANE-and the left-leaning Catholic adversaries of Opus Dei who opposed the American-backed repression in Central America.
Robert Novak. The conservative columnist admitted on July 12 that Mr. Hanssen had served as his main source for a 1997 column attacking Janet Reno, then the U.S. Attorney General, for supposedly covering up 1996 campaign-finance scandals.

The part starting with "Robert Novak" seems disjoint from the rest of the quote and ought to have some sort of further explanation, even if it's just "[With regards to] Robert Novak...". Ario 23:38, 17 January 2006 (UTC)


This sentence seems messy to me:

Hanssen hired lawyer Plato Cacheris. On May 10, 2002, in exchange for cooperating with authorities, he was spared the death penalty and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, and his wife, along with her six children, received the survivor's part Hanssen's husband's pension, $39,000 per year.

Does anyone have any good ideas of how to clean it up?--Kristjan Wager 20:29, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

-

How's this?

"Following his indictment, Hanssen hired notable trial lawyer Plato Cacheris in his defense. In exchange for divulging the extent of his activities, he recieved a life sentence without parole in lieu of the death penalty. His wife and six children receive $39,000 annually from Hanssen's federal pension."

Not to clutter the Talk page, but I just thought I'd note how unbelievably mind-boggling it is that the Russian government would knowingly hand anything over to Islamic fundamentalists, let alone Al Qaeda, if that was in fact what happened. - Gpotter511@yahoo.com 21:26, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Opus Dei member category

This article is currently in the "Opus Dei Members" category, but I couldn't find much in the article saying that he is. Is this possibly the source of the categorization?

"Bonnie made him confess to a priest, identified by the New York Times as the Reverend Robert P. Bucciarelli, former head of Opus Dei in the USA."

... But this just says Robert P. Bucciarelli, not Robert Hanssen, was a member.

Then there's this quote:

"Among the many groups under surveillance by the F.B.I. in those days were the Gray Panthers, nuclear-freeze advocates associated with SANE-and the left-leaning Catholic adversaries of Opus Dei who opposed the American-backed repression in Central America."

... But this just tells Opus Dei was among the organizations under surveillance by the FBI.

That is the two sole references to Opus Dei in the current article.

I'm posting this in the talk page instead of just bluntly removing the category inclusion in case I'm missing something. The categorization should obviously be removed if he was incorrectly put there. And if he was a member, the article should clearly tell so. So I'd recommend an edit in either case, depending on what's true. -- Northgrove 00:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reference to Movie

I restored the reference to the film about Robert Hanssen. It is relevant to the topic at hand, and does not directly represent a commercial interest. -- TriGeek 08:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Surely a review of the movie can be found that isn't on a site where an article (under the Same Sex Union backgrounder) has the heading "Why homosexual relationships disadvantage children"? I changed it from that MercatorNet site to a Boston Globe review. Buggieboy 23:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oh yeah?

I would suggest something drastic be done by the assertion "Federal authorities were aided by the opening of the KGB archives." Yes, I can see it is sourced, but is it at all plausible? So the Russians should somehow have forgotten to exempt from the released archives info about an ongoing source in the FBI, the best agent they ever had? Come on! It is far more likely that these informations were secured through a somewhat more covert procedure. Ctande 04:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I was actually wondering that, myself. If that was their source, one has to wonder why they still needed a "smoking gun".
I'm also not sure why an FBI agent would have information on things that seem to be more the foray of the CIA. I mean, as far as I know, the FBI is generally tasked with domestic stuff. Why would any FBI agent know the names of KGB agents who are working for the United States? TerraFrost 16:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

FBI deals with counterterrorism and to counter espionage on U.S. soil.75Janice 03:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)75Janice2 March 2007

[edit] Neither here nor there

I removed from the early life segment:

According to important federal court documents, Hanssen told his Moscow handlers that he read My Silent War, the autobiography of British intelligence mole Kim Philby, when he was 14, and came to think of Philby as a hero. (The book, however, was published in 1968, when Hanssen was 24.)

This is neither here nor there. It is out of place to put in something that cannot be correct, even if it was asserted in an important document. As the statement is obviously not accurate, one is only left to speculate what kernel of value there is here, i.e, what is the information value. That he lied about his age when he read the book? That his impulse wasn't that book after all? That he wanted to keep the Russians guessing as to his identity by leaving a wrong clue about his age? Or he just remembered it wrongly? -- and so on.

If somebody would like to put the deleted part back in, please reformulate so that it does not appear so out of place. Maybe somewhere else in the article? Ctande 06:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)