Robert Clarkson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tax protesters

History

Arguments

Constitutional
Statutory
Conspiracy


Notable tax protesters

Robert Clarkson - Vivien Kellems
Mitch Modeleski - Irwin Schiff
Richard Michael Simkanin
William J. Benson
Wayne C. Bentson


Related topics

The Law That Never Was
Cheek v. United States
Titles of Nobility Amendment
Tax avoidance and tax evasion
Tax resistance
Christian Patriot
Posse Comitatus

This box: view  talk  edit

Robert Barnwell Clarkson is a tax protester in South Carolina. Clarkson graduated from law school in 1970. He was brought up on lawyer misconduct charges in 1976 and in 1977 was indicted on numerous accounts of preparing fraudulent tax returns and presenting false claims to the United States Department of the Treasury.[citation needed] In 1978 his lawyer misconduct hearings were concluded at the South Carolina State Supreme Court and he was disbarred.[1][1].

In 1978 he was convicted of several felonies and given a suspended sentence with 5 years probation, under the condition that he not be involved with income tax schemes. In 1979 he violated his probation and was sent to federal prison.[citation needed]

In 1984 he was paroled on the condition that he not be involved with income tax schemes. One year later he violated his parole and was again sent back to federal prison.[citation needed]

In 1989 Clarkson started an organization called the Carolina Patriots with two associates. They taught classes on how to evade the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Numerous clients had legal problems after taking their advice.[citation needed]

In 1994, a federal agent attended their class. In April of 1994, Clarkson and two associates were indicted for conspiracy to impede, impair, obstruct and defeat the functions of the Internal Revenue Service under 18 U.S.C. § 371. All three were convicted, and the convictions were upheld on appeal.[2] They were sentenced to 57 months in prison.[3] He was released from prison in April of 1999.[2] In affirming the conviction of Clarkson and his co-defendants, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit rejected his argument that he had a First Amendment right in connection with certain tax protest-related speeches held at various meetings:

The defendants' words and acts were not remote from the commission of the criminal acts. The evidence shows that the defendants held meetings and collected money from attendees whom they instructed and advised to claim unlawful exemptions and not to file income tax returns or pay tax on wages in violation of the United States Tax Code. The evidence shows that the attendees followed the instruction and advice of the defendants, that the attendees' unlawful actions were solicited by the defendants, and that the defendants were aware that the attendees were following their instructions and advice. The evidence discloses that a purpose of the meetings was to encourage people to unlawful actions by convincing them that it was legal to claim false exemptions, to hide income, and to refuse to file income tax returns or pay income tax. [ . . . ] We conclude that no reasonable juror could conclude that the defendants' words and actions were merely advocating opposition to the income tax laws.[4]

Following his release from prison the third time, Clarkson co-founded an organization called the Patriot Network. He sells books that claim to teach you how to avoid paying taxes and holds tax protester meetings.

In May of 2004, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that Clarkson had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law and held that Clarkson was guilty of criminal contempt. He was sentenced to six months in jail. The sentence was suspended for five years, however, on three conditions: (1) that Clarkson and the South Carolina Office of Disciplinary Counsel submit to the Court an agreed-upon disclaimer stating that Clarkson is not an attorney and is not licensed to practice law in South Carolina or in any other state; (2) that Clarkson file an affidavit stating that the disclaimer has been prominently and permanently placed on any and all of his websites and on all literature authored and/or published by Clarkson; and (3) that Clarkson no longer engage in the unauthorized practice of law.[3]

In 2005, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a lawsuit requesting an injunction against Clarkson in a U.S. District Court in South Carolina. The DOJ is asking that the court bar Clarkson from selling his tax schemes and holding classes.[4] The Department is also asking that the court require Clarkson to hand over the names and addresses of his clients. As of January 2007, this case is pending.[5]

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ In the Matter of Clarkson, 271 S.C. 5, 244 S.E.2d 512 (1978).
  2. ^ See Fleschner v. United States, 98 F.3d 155, 96-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) paragr. 50,536 (4th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 2484 (1997).
  3. ^ United States v. Clarkson, No. 5:1994cr00010, Entry 137 (W.D.N.C. 1994).
  4. ^ See Fleschner, 98 F.3d at 158-59.
  5. ^ United States v. Clarkson, case no. 8:05-2734-HMH-BHH; U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Anderson Division.