User talk:RingtailedFox/Archive 3

Oh, the weather outside is frightful!... But I hope wherever you you are, that it's warm and delightful!

Dear RingtailedFox/Archive 3, I want you wish you a very happy holiday! WereWolf 22:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

Hello! If you wish to nominate a picture at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, please see the instructions at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Nomination Procedure. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. --KFP (talk | contribs) 01:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

• I presume the image you meant to nominate is Image:Sears Tower ss.jpg? The nomination subpage for that image is currently in the wrong place. For Featured picture candidates, it should be located at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sears Tower ss. However, I'm afraid that this particular image does not meet the current resolution requirement of 1000 pixels height or width stated at WP:WIAFP. --KFP (talk | contribs) 14:41, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

• • I agree that it's good picture. Perhaps the photographer has a larger version? --KFP (talk | contribs) 14:48, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edmonton

I heard it was a bit of a hole. ;-) Matthew 16:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Windsor, Ontario Coat of Arms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Windsor, Ontario Coat of Arms.jpg. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Ignore my revert, it was an accident. --Sopoforic 04:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't put any other links to downloads, but that one should be fine. I just misread it when I hit revert, that's all. --Sopoforic 04:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your sig

It's so freakin' huge!!!! :-P I'm fine with the color scheme, but can you make it a little bit shorter? Thanks in advance. Nishkid64 01:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your sig

Well, I think the coding and the actual length are both problems here. Can you try removing "The Legendary Raccoon Fox:" and possibly use smaller font? Thanks. Nishkid64 20:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TV Templates

First of all -- the main reason I've reversed some of your template changes is that I feel they are unnecessary and superfluous -- they practically add nothing, and some of the added features are unnecessary.

Second -- the new template design interferes with the infoboxes -- they literally overlap them, due to coding. I hope you understand. -- azumanga 04:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sonic Movie.

I've noticed that you intend to constantly edit info on a Sonic SatAM movie into the Sonic the Hedgehog (SatAM) article. Please stop this. You are failing to cite references, and the tone is very gossipy. Though Rich maybe just a multimedia specialist thats done graphic design and directed music videos for local indie bands, his idea of a sonic movie is still possible, but not absolute. Until SEGA announces it, or a popular film resource like Variety makes mention of actual production, it's not welcome in the article.

Further more, Wiki isn't here to spread rumors on movies that aren't even in pre-production. He hasn't even presented the idea in full to SEGA, and the American department. This is not article worthy in any way/shape/form. Please stop posting it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/farck11 (talk) 00:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC).

[edit] NDP

Hope you don't mind but I replaced the manual userbox for the NDP on your About page with a nearly identical one from my userspace (the only difference is that mine, which was copied from another one just before the great userbox purge, says "New Democratic Party *of Canada*". If you don't like the way it looks, feel free to revert. :) Good page by the way! Orderinchaos78 07:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Highway 33 (Ontario)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, RingtailedFox! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 22:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] HTML

You've been adding a bunch of HTML blank lines to pages. HTML should only be used when needed—see WP:MOS—and, in this case, it isn't needed. Just use two blank lines if you want more space between the end of the article and the boxes. --Walor 00:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

As I already explained, none of it is needed. Unneeded HTML gets deleted, i.e. everything you've spent all that time adding will be reverted. --Walor 03:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:KTLA logo colour.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:KTLA logo colour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:WPIX cable logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WPIX cable logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: KTLA logos

I'm just curious as to why you're removing KTLA's icons from the past... they're the legitimate logos from the station, and they are fair-use as they are low-resolution, and do not infringe upon any copyrights, as i've listed the sources for both.

Well, one picture is nothing more than another variation of the 1981 logo, and the other "cable/satellite" logo is one that I'm sure has never been used on the air (and if it has was never widely used). As some admins are looking to purge all "fair-use" images from television station articles, I felt the best way to keep the bloodletting at a minimum would be to remove the redundancy ourselves. Hense, the 1989 picture, which is basically the same from '81, and the cable pic were deleted from the page. Let's keep the pertinent logos in the article, and not two or three versions of the same thing -- even with different backgrounds. Rollosmokes 09:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

And, wouldn't ya know? A Man in Black has taken all the images -- including the ones I incoporated into the text itself -- from the article. Here we go again. Rollosmokes 09:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding "Communications in St.-Pierre et Miquelon"

According to the WRTH, RFO in St.-Pierre & Miquelon exclusively uses the SECAM-K1 standard like all other French DOM-TOMs. Why they were not allowed to use the SECAM-L standard that Metropolitan France has is beyond me, but since RFO is the only television broadcaster in the whole territory, then why would RFO use PAL, as you placed in the Communications in Saint Pierre and Miquelon article? They don't. -Daniel Blanchette 21:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of radio stations in Ontario

Adding the {{tocright}} was genius — nice move! Bearcat 20:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

*laugh* I didn't even know we could do that, so you're one up on me. Bearcat 20:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I knew the tag existed, but I didn't know it would eliminate the blank space like that. Bearcat 20:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, while we're at it, I've been indecisive about whether or not to split the Atlantic Canada and territorial lists into separate lists for each individual province or territory. Just curious what you think — would it be a good idea, or is it unnecessary at this point? Bearcat 20:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harassment

Alright. Trolls are against policy. Follow the instructions at WP:U and report him. But remember that removing content from user pages, unless its your own, is also against policy. I am going to have to revert your edits to his user page, but consider reporting him. Wikipedian27 22:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• Check my talk page.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 22:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Don't steal information without crediting, and you won't get harassed. Seems reasonable no? I spend a lot of time to create the information that I do, and it disgusts me to see it blatantly stolen without the decency to even reference the text. This text MUST NOT be reinstated! --Sonysnob 00:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Its not properly referenced, and was copied and pasted with words added. My website is not public domain, and while I really don't care what you place on this website, it must not come from my website.

Furthermore, there is no need to resort to childish name calling, and it looks like we might just have a revert war on our hands.--Sonysnob 01:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Assistance

Why did you delete my request for help? RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 02:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Did you see the header at the top of the page? Besides, you cross-posted it. No need to clutter a talk page that's for "discussion of the guideline" not claims of harassment. Your post at Wikipedia:Village pump (assistance) should suffice, but you might also consider WP:AN/I. -- Scientizzle 02:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I am not refusing to listen to anything. The content was taken without my permission, and I am reacting accordingly. Unlike Wikipedia, I take Copyright violations seriously. I am most pleased that you will no longer be visiting the website in the future. I was planning on blocking you from visiting anyways. Your name will be quickly removed, and should the same thing happen again here, I will be more careful with its spelling.--Sonysnob 03:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I find that unlikely, as i don't contribute to your website, and i don't take anything from it. you do NOT own a road or information in the public domain. I wonder what type of banning tools you even have, anyway. Now, we can be civil and discuss it on Talk:Highway 401 (Ontario)#Constant_reverting if you wish. RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 03:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Highway 401 (Ontario) multiple reverts

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Highway 401 (Ontario). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Dl2000 03:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Why would I want you to keep visiting? Look at where it has gotten me thus far. You have basically stolen something from my website, and I don't want to happen again. When you research an article, if you are to reproduce something, the reproduction should be unrecognizable from the original. The facts will of course be the same, but the rest should be rewritten from scratch, otherwise you have committed plagiarism. I am aware you added and rearranged some text, however, the bulk of your addition was still copied and pasted from my website, and therefore written by me. Furthermore, while a link was included to the source at the end of the paragraph, it was not properly referenced at the bottom in the references section, as cited text should be.

Herein lies the problem with Wikipedia, it is you who has used content inappropriately from me, and now just to get plagerized material off the internet I have to fight with you, who has has called me a vandal, and screamed harassment, while all the time using childish insults. The insults must stop, or I will be forced to take decisive action on the OntHighways.com website itself.

I trust this will end the dispute.

--Sonysnob 14:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

How in the world is something that is publically available from the MTO and re-worded on your website somehow copyright infringement against you? Your website does NOT contain original works, it contains re-worked and (hopefully) cited information from the MTO and other sources. If we use your same argument, I must ask - how dare you infringe on the MTO's copyright! Dude, this information is in the public domain. The protections that allow you to post it on your website also protect other users from posting them on Wikipedia. A reference was made, this is sufficient according to Wikipedia's copyright policy. If you continually revert the 401 page, I trust users other than myself will take whatever action is necessary to prevent your vandalism. Snickerdo 18:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't think that you get it. I am not plagiarizing anything. I went out took photographs, researched the construction, went to public meetings and did a write up about the status of the construction. I have a sources page on my website, that details where I get information. You are of course allowed to do this as well. What you are not allowed to do is to copy and paste peoples work and call it your own. Yes, I realize that you added words and rearranged some wordings, however, this still constitutes plagiarism. To not plagiarize somebody's work, you need to put the facts read into your own words. This has not been done, as although the text has been altered, it still is not entirely your own words, which again constitutes plagiarism. The solution to this is simple, either directly quote all of the text taken from the website, and reference it PROPERLY, or re-write the article, and again properly reference just the facts. If this were argument were being held in an educational institution not only would you not get credited for your research, but this type of theft would be grounds from dismissal from an post secondary institution. --Sonysnob 19:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

That's good and all that you took the photographs. I have not uploaded a single photograph or directly cut-and-paste from your page. We also never said we were plagiarizing as we sourced and REWORDED your information, AS YOU ASKED US TO. i've come to believe you just don't want anything that seems similar to your website to be on wikipedia. If we were to play by your rules, then you would be expelled as well. You dismiss every argument that is not your own. So, basically...anything that seems similar to your website is plagiarism. To be honest, i don't even know what you want. You can claim copyright violation all you want, but it's not a copyright violation. you can point at a chicken and say it's a duck all you want, but that will never make it a duck. RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 20:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm glad to hear you've brought this to arbitration. I think we need to have Sonysnob blocked until the final outcome has been decided, as well. He is clearly violating the warnings given about reverting the page. Snickerdo 20:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Recuse

See wikt:recuse. Basically, I won't be deliberating on the case due to my involvement. Kirill Lokshin 21:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Ahh. alright. RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 21:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Copyvio

Since subtlety is apparently lost here:

I am hereby informing you, in my official capacity as an administrator, that, in my judgement, the material in question constitutes a copyright violation. I have therefore removed it from the article. Further, I will enforce this removal by blocking any editor that attempts to reinsert the material or a substantially identical version. Kirill Lokshin 04:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

All I want is for you to not add any material that violates someone's copyright. This means that you can't add any text—not even a single sentence—that's copied, word-for-word, from some copyrighted source (unless you're quoting it directly, of course). If you're rewording, you need to do it so properly; simply changing a few words or sentences but leaving chunks of the original text is not sufficient. Kirill Lokshin 04:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do. The idea is to present the same facts, but to do so in a completely different manner; so don't just settle for changing the wording, but go for more substantial changes (rearranging and restructuring sentences and clauses, etc.) as well. Kirill Lokshin 04:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Highway 401 Proposal

In the late Fall of 2005, the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario started a construction project to upgrade the current 4-lane section of Highway 401 from 4- to 6-lanes from west of Oxford County Road 3 to west of Waterloo Regional Road 97 (where the next 6-lane concrete-divded road begins) in the County of Oxford and Regional Municipality of Waterloo.
This is currently part of the last 4-laned section between London and Toronto (stretching from Highway 403 Interchange in Woodstock, Ontario to Waterloo Road 97 in Kitchener, Ontario), but is being upgraded to 6 lanes plus an Ontario tall-wall barrier in the median. This is the first stage of upgrades of this final 4-lane section.
Aside from the addition of one lane per direction and a tall-wall barrier, two emergency onramp accesses that are intended to be used only during emergency highway closures and other such incidents have been constructed. These emergency accesses are the first of their kind on an Ontario freeway, and have been constructed in the vicinity of both Oxford Road 3, and Trussler Road.
Other emergency accesses have been built in Essex County where the road was recently widened from 4 to 6 lanes, but these are gravel, and all are alongside overpasses, for use by ambulances, firetrucks, and police cars in emergencies only.

[edit] Your Message

Hello again, sorry I couldn't contact you sooner, just logged on. If you ever feel that there has been misdoing by an administrator or a regular user for that matter try WP:AN/I and briefly summarize the incidents in question.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello Detroit Architectural contributers:

The following category Category:Buildings with sculpture by Corrado Parducci is up for deletion. (I don't know how to make a link to it, but go to your favorite 1920s or 1930s Detroit Building and it is probably there ) You can vote for or against this action. Please consider doing this here. It is number 1:34. Thanks Carptrash 03:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Highways

Highway 637 never enters Greater Sudbury in any way. Just so you know. Bearcat 23:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coincidence at tornado records

I tried to start discussion on the talk page but since you seem to have missed it I'll bring the discussion here. I have several issues with the "Tornado of the Elevens" going on the records page.

1. I fail to see how a single tornado occurring at a specific date and time is a "spectacular" coincidence. I'm sure if you look hard enough you could find one at 12:34 on 5/6 of one year...it's just not that "spectacular" of an occurrance. Plus, it was 11:11 PM, which is 23:11 in many countries.
2. Emphasis on the single tornado. While the other note about Codell is extremely rare (even a town being hit 3 times in recorded history is very unusual), this was one tornado which struck at a certain time.
3. What does the 11:11 mean, anyway? I highly doubt the tornado lasted for less than a minute, so what happened at 11:11? Did it touch down? First start producing damage? Reach the center of town? It just seems very ambiguous to just pull this specific minute out of an event that undoubtedly spanned several minutes.

I'd like to hear back from you so we can come to a comprimise (or understanding) -RunningOnBrains 05:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Userpage edits

Just to let you know, I fixed up some minor errors (such as a lowercase "I" when you were referencing yourself). Blast 05,03,07 0247 (UTC)

[edit] Who Framed Roger Rabbit sectional neutrality

I don't have any problem with the article having an Anachronisms section. The problem is that it isn't written in a neutral point-of-view tone. The general tone of the section indicates commentary rather than objective fact explaining. Wikipedia is not a place for commentary pieces or reviews. Phrases such as "With this in mind, several anachronistic errors are easily spotted." and "The appearance of post-1947 Toons can be explained..." doesn't really allow the viewer to simply look at the facts and decide for themselves why these anachronisms may exist. It isn't the article's purpose to lay out a framework as to the reasons for a movie (or other fictional work) having particular anachronisms. Wording such as "An error that could not be justified..." is a blatant infusion of biased passive-voice wording regarding what the writer thinks is a particular anachronistic error. This isn't the proper way to write such a section and it needs to be cleaned up. Bumm13 03:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RaccoonFox, is that you?

Hi RingtailedFox,

I am Smcafirst, remember me? Your good partner at WP:GHR? Well, while you were not here, we expanded the project quite a lot, and my user account expanded too. Why didn't you tell me when you return to Wikipedia? I would like to invite you back to our WikiProject. And I recruited numerous members, the project grew to about 13 active members, 2 pending members, and 1 inactive member (which is RaccoonFox, maybe you). Please reply at my talk page. I am so glad you are back.

Check my user page, it changed A LOT!

 Smcafirst | Chit-Chat  posted at 21:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

If you are not RaccoonFox, ignore this message. But I would like you to join our WikiProject anyways, since you seemed to have experience.  Smcafirst | Chit-Chat  posted at 21:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

RaccoonFox, I mean RingtailedFox, please add the infobox you created earlier, you know {{Golden Horseshoe Roads}} to your userpage! Thank you! SO glad you came back!  Smcafirst | Chit-Chat  posted at 21:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] County Road Shields and Welcome back!

Hi RingtailedFox,

Well, while you left, many things happened, it's hard for me to explain everything. It's kind of a long story. First, I was attempting to create those road shields using Arial font (how stupid am I?). Then, I met Ilovevancouver90909, a good helper of mine (I actually met him in real life!), and he taught me how to make those road signs. We then started to create a lot of articles on Roads in Markham, and York Regional Roads, and Simcoe County Roads. Ilovevancouver90909 made the York Regional Road shields (which are way better than mine), and I made some of the Simcoe County Road shield, and I will be restarting them soon.

Later, I met Nhl4hamilton, another good helper, he is so proficient and tireless of making Hamilton-related articles, that I rewarded him a barnstar (and he rewarded me one too), and then we are currently working on expanding the project, and eventually (planned for summer 07), we will include everything in the Golden Horseshoe, everything from roads to communities to landmarks! And planned for winter 08-09, we might expand the project to WikiProject Quebec City-Windsor Corridor, and that will make us very busy!

Then, I met another person (I don't want to type it out, it's very long), and we started the OUTREACH department! We were planning to make newsletter and all kinds of stuff, but we simply have no time at all!

Anyway, welcome back!

 Smcafirst | Chit-Chat  posted at 21:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit at County Road 8 (Essex County, Ontario)

Hi RingtailedFox,

This reminds me of the old times, when we argue which is the correct title. Well, here it comes again. I think it would be a better title if it is Essex County Road 8, Ontario or simply Essex County Road 8. This would make it more uniform, like I had did with other County/Regional Roads. What do you think?

 Smcafirst | Chit-Chat  posted at 22:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] County/Regional Road Shields

Yea, there is a template that I made that I work with. Just steal one of them and delete the numbers and the region/county name. Remember that the road shields have the word COUNTY/REGION at the TOP and the county/region name on the BOTTOM. Don't ask me why. :)

ilovevancouver90909 • (Talk • My Contributions) • Signed on 21 March 2007 at 18:29 EDT

It is "Hit the Road" size 72 for the REGION and YORK. You can download the font at http://dafont.com and search "Hit the Road". The number is Hit the Road size 200. (if it doesn't fit, make the font smaller or stretch the shield sideways.

ilovevancouver90909 • (Talk • My Contributions) • Signed on 21 March 2007 at 18:36 EDT

PS: Happy Spring!

[edit] RE:Categories

I'm sorry, but I've got almost no idea what your talking about. Did I delete something, or vote on something, or something? -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 02:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

The category was listed at WP:CSD under G4 (reposts of xFD deleted material). The pertinent discussion was at Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_December_5#Ontario_county_roads_subcategories back in December, with the decision to put all the articles into Category:Ontario county roads instead of having smaller categories. I'm not sure what (if anything) has changed since then, but the best place to discuss it would probably be Wikipedia:WikiProject Ontario Highways (which I see you're part of already) or with Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads even (I see you're a part of that too). If something has changed with the categorization, then feel free to recreate it if that is what people have decided. I was just following CSD (yes I know, bad defence, but I didn't know any other information at the time). -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 02:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA Request (Would you like to nominate me?)

Hi RingtailedFox,

It's me again! I am planning to try to Request for Adminship (RfA). I failed miserably in the January's RfA with only 33% consensus. Well, I will be on again at RfA probably next month, probably during Easter. Will you be willing to nominate me? Please see my Editor Review, and review me (give me comments, feedback, and coach me) and make your decision, please nominate me! I have currently about 3100 edits, which is doubled of my edit count during my first RfA, and during the upcoming weeks, I'll probably squeeze 500 more edit counts.

Thank you, and please reply,

 Smcafirst | Chit-Chat  posted at 01:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)