Talk:Richard Taylor (UK politician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He was aided by the Liberal Democrats even though he backed Section 28? This seems unlikely.
Acegikmo1 17:40, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I live in the constituency and can confirm that the Lib Dems did indeed support Dr Taylor, despite several differences of opinion. The hospital issue overrode everything else. Loganberry 23:34, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- It appears they are doing the same again this year. See this press release from the Wyre Forest LD's. It also appears that Dr Taylor supports some ideas the LDs have. - Hoshie/Crat 07:52, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- In his 2001 manifesto he said he wanted to keep Section 28, but in the Commons he actually voted to repeal it.http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2003-03-10&number=109&display=allvotes
- It appears they are doing the same again this year. See this press release from the Wyre Forest LD's. It also appears that Dr Taylor supports some ideas the LDs have. - Hoshie/Crat 07:52, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The External link to Taylor's profile is out of date, having been written in 2002; however, I can't find a more up to date one on the BBC's website. Loganberry 18:18, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
To clarify, Taylor is not an independant member of the Commons, he is with IKHH. Mikeroberts 16:18, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Section 28
Re: "These non-health policies include Section 28". To clarify, is he for or against the Section 28 amendment? Frankie Roberto 21:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Categories: Biography articles of living people | Politics and government work group articles | Stub-Class biography (politics and government) articles | Unknown-priority biography (politics and government) articles | Stub-Class biography articles | Automatically assessed biography articles | Automatically assessed biography (politics and government) articles