Talk:Richard Morgan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Do you have a source for that quote? Ninebelow 17:25, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

It was in an interview, which I read on http://www.saxonbullock.com/richardmorganinterview.htm. --Shimbo 09:56, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Market Forces could be a prequel to the other three novels (there are many references to Mars in MF, for example, and Shorn Investments is mentioned in Woken Furies). This is completly hypothetical on my part as far as I know, but the possibility's there. Ewan 14:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

I thought everyone believed Market Forces was a prequel? It really is quite obvious in my opinion. --86.2.153.77 15:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Given that at one point the protagonist describes reading 'Altered Carbon' it seems far from obvious to me. Shimbo 20:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Way, WAY too many co-incidences. --86.2.153.77 01:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

here's richard morgan on the subject http://www.nightshadebooks.com/cgi-bin/discus/show.cgi?tpc=1308&post=60910#POST60910 --Death to poets 14:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] == Studying Economics? ==

The article had this quote (apparently dispute if Morgan was studying economics):

Spoke to Richard on Saturday at Eastercon (15/04/06) in Glasgow. His wife and not Richard is doing the Economics Course. According to him.

I've removed the disputed line and this comment. Nloth 03:15, 23 May 2006 (UTC)