User talk:Rgb9000
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi Rgb9000, and welcome to Wikipedia.
Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:
- Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
- The help centre and FAQs
- The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions
It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.
When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~~~~. (Just so you know, some people won't pay attention to unsigned comments).
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.
Above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!
– T.P.K. 08:50, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Space Tree on Newgrounds
Hey. You recently edited Space Tree saying it was on Newgrounds. Could you please provide proof for these claims? Thanks. Tobb
Done. But why? --R
What can I say? I'm a cynic. But thanks nonetheless. Tobb
[edit] image:UH005.gif
Hello Cohesion,
I see that you recently deleted images UH005.gif and other important UH-related images. These were images of the logo and mascot of University of Houston. I missed the argument for their deletion, and was unaware they were on the chopping block. Could you give me a little more background on why logos of a public university were deleted, when every other major university I look up has it's logo and/or seal at the top of the article and mascot in the sports section? Even if it had a tagging problem, it was a logo for a public university and I would rather it had been corrected than deleted. Viewing an archive I see that they were tagged as logos, and should fall under WP:L. I am considering reuploading it myself because I strongly feel that University of Houston should have it's logo,seal, and mascot on it's article page.
Thanks for your time,
--Rgb9000 06:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yes they probably should be re-uploaded. The problem was they didn't supply a source, and I couldn't add that since I didn't know where they came from. I usually will tag them correctly if they are just tagged wrong, but no source is a little harder. Usually it's better to re-upload them from somewhere where you know where they came from rather than guess. I do think they are fine to be tagged with {{logo}} though, and are definitely valid under fair use. Sorry for the disruption. :) - cohesion 13:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)