Template:RfB

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] {{{User}}}

Voice your opinion (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 08:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Example User (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves) - Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: ok... ~~~~

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. Have you read the discussions on when to promote and not promote? What do you understand the criteria for promotion to be?

A.

2. How would you deal with contentious nominations where a decision to promote or not promote might be criticized?

A.

3. Wikipedians expect bureaucrats to adhere to high standards of fairness, knowledge of policy and the ability to engage others in the community. Why do you feel you meet those standards?

A.

4. Do you have the time and do you have the desire to visit WP:RFA, WP:B/RFA, and/or WP:CHU on a regular basis to attend to those requests?

A.

General comments

• Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

---

Discussion

• I suggest we make this nominee a bureaucrat because .....
• I've got concerns that lead me to think that's a bad idea...
• Have folks considered that...?

Support

1. Support
2. Support
3. ...

Oppose

1. Oppose
2. Oppose
3. ...

Neutral

1. Neutral
2. Neutral
3. ...