User talk:RevTarthpeigust
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:
- Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
- To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
- You can experiment in the Sandbox.
- For help, see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.
- Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- You can contribute in many ways: write a great article, fight vandalism, upload pictures, perform maintainance tasks, contribute to existing projects...
I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.
-- utcursch | talk 06:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chris Cheng
Thank you for spotting that this article was inappropriate. However, a deletion notice sbould be added and the page should not be blanked. If it is a non-notable biography, add {{{Db-bio}}} (one extra set of brackets added to prevent this page being nominated!)--File Éireann 20:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hugh Selwyn Mauberley
Hi. Thanks for the note. The article definitely needs a lot more work and I encourage you to add more material. Articles on individual poems have a bit of a habit of turning into personal essays, going against the wikipedia policy of no original research ... therefore it is particularly important to cite reliable sources so others can verify the content. For example, the article on The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock has been greatly improved by the addition of footnotes (see Wikipedia:Footnotes). I'm away from my library at the moment so can't help out with much of referencing at the moment. My overall impression is that the material re HSM seems ok, although there could be a lot more, but that we need to back it up with references, but that there is also a some 'off-target' stuff where the content strays into broader discussion.
By the way, I'm not sure if you are aware of the Poetry Portal ... if not, you might be interested in helping out with it ... the content changes every week and we always need help in preparing content for future weeks (you can do this by clicking on the Archive link in each panel which takes you to past and future entries). There is also Wikipedia:WikiProject Poetry which is not very active at the moment, but it might provide a place for coordinating efforts to fill in some of the big poetry gaps in wikipedia. Cheers. Stumps 06:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Super Chikan article lack of references
In the Super Chikan article, the sources of your information are not referenced. Could you do so per WP:V and WP:CITE? Thanks! Mattisse(talk) 22:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
