Talk:Reuben (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- You could have gotten a better picture(!) Kevin Doran 00:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
the picture is great! shhhhh
Contents |
[edit] Guy & Jon Articles
I think its about time there were stub articles with a little info about John and Guy, like the one for Jamie. I was gonna make them but as i dont know them personally i cant fill in information such as DOB and early years. Does anyone who knows such information feel like doing these articles?Smithybob 21:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 3rd Album
I reckon there's enough info on the new album (at the very least a list of potential tracks for inclusion) to create a link for it in the discog section. Anyone agree? Chipstick 07:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Maybe just a subsection in the main Reuben article for now - can't really create the article until the album's name is known (or at least a working title or something) Ricmelia 09:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah just say they're in the process of recording.
Okay, fair enough. Chipstick 13:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merging What Happens in Aldershot Stays in Aldershort into this article
This has been suggested by another user. Possibly a good idea though I expect far more information to be added to the DVD article in a few weeks once it's been released. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ricmelia (talk • contribs) 15:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
If more information can be added after the release, then we may as well leave it as a separate article instead of merging then de-merging it, surely? Chipstick 20:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I think it should be kept as a seperate article. Otherwise the main reuben article will be huge, i for one get bored reading long articles. --213.249.247.129 20:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Appearances on Compilations
I think it looks overdone with the pictures of all the compilation appearances. Im not gonna change it as people will probably object. However no other bands have this sort of information on their pages. I suggest we put this section as a list of names at most. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smithybob (talk • contribs) 21:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC).
It seems a shame to get rid of the pictures, but I suppose I agree with you. I would suggest a table given the name of the compilation, the year of release and the Reuben song featured. Chipstick 21:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh and just to prove you wrong, Smithybob, (sorry!) My Chemical Romance's discog (here) has a similar layout for compilation appearances. Not that I'm using that to suggest we should keep what's there (necessarily), but just to point it out, other discographies do use this format. Chipstick 19:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Haha fair enough. It looks much better how it is now, im happy with that. Smithybob 13:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Separate discog article?
This is always dodgy ground, but the discography seems big enough to sepatate into it's own article ('Reuben Discography'). Most artist articles with large discographys seem to simply put the albums in the main article and go into more detail in the separate one. Does anyone agree? Chipstick 21:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I definately think its a sensible way to go, but i think we should wait until the new album is released.Smithybob 13:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Sure I'd go with that :) Chipstick 23:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
