User talk:Resurgent insurgent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Resurgent insurgent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 
--Runcorn 22:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Coburg FC article

I altered the tag you put on there. The article isn't an exact (or remarkably close) recreation of the original article, so it doesn't qualify for G4, but it's certainly nonsense or vandalism - so either one of those will do nicely. =^_^= --Dennisthe2 18:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CFSD ERM

Hi there. I think the article on ERM should definately stand even they are a competitor to the company I work for. The consultancy is definately sizeable and influential and should remain. --Alex 17:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

Resurgent insurgent,

I see that you're a new user here, so I don't want to bite the newbie, but I just want to let you know that I do not appreciate your tone in the Sino-American War AfD. As you may have guessed, I like a good debate, but I will not tolerate rude phrase such as "or else shut up". Please be more considerate in the future. I think you will find Wikipedia is much more pleasnat experience without the WikiDrama. Thanks, and happy editing.

Sincerely,

Lovelac7 02:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moore

References should be forthcoming. The bio is consistent, it asserts notability. I put on an unsourced tag as a reminder but I see no reason to doubt it--the type of material added seems to indicate it was based on a local history. If I cannot source it I will send it for deletion myself. The guy you added seems a perfectly good subject, so I certainly didn't want to just revert the article. I don't think it necessarily the best way to use an article for one subject as an article for someone else --if you find other people of the name, great, and they go in new articles. This way we'll end up, I hope,with 2 good articles. You are right that 19th c. people sometimes have entries in google, but only if someone happens to have written or done something in connection with them since the 1990s, so its good if one finds them, but not a negative signal if one doesn't. I do appreciate your work--this is the way to clear up problems. DGG 04:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NBC logos

Given the related AfD's - you may wish to look at NBC logos, which is pretty much the same as the slogans except it's logos. Also fully unreferenced.Garrie 03:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfDs etc

This article on Moore always puzzled me, especially in terms with the group addition of other bios by apparent other eds, so I am tryingto clear it up. I'm certainly not trying to quarrel, and I hope I havent given that impression. I don't want to appear at cross purposes with you at AfDs, since we both seem to be there a good deal. DGG 03:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)