Talk:Restorative justice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Retributive Justice: Restorative Justice:
Crime is violation of state (e.g., Texas vs. Lee)

but consideration of harm caused to another is important in retributive justice

One person harms another - direct responsibility
Focus on blame Focus on problem-solving
Adversarial relationship (lawyers fight it out) Dialog and negotiation (victim & offender)

adversarial relationship is certainly possible in restorative justice as well; it is not a magic solution that automatically resolves conflict

Pain/punishment Restitution/restoration
Interpersonal conflicts are obscured - Individual vs. State Interpersonal conflicts recognized and valued - solutions sought


One social injury replaced by another

Although, retributive punishment is not a social injury in the point of view of retributive justice

Focus on repair of social injury
Competitive lawyers and points of view


Discovery and social interests served


Victim mostly ignored and sidelined


Victim rights affirmed
Offender passive (does the time)

Not always, punishment can be constructive (as long as it is still punishment)

Offender to take responsibility & make restitution
Offender merely has to take punishment Offender usually learns impact of their crime and how to make right


Purely legal Whole context must be considered
Debt to state is abstract Debt is to victim with state facilitating
Stigma of crime is often not removable


Stigma often removed through restoration of justice and peace


No repentance or forgiveness Possibility of both
Depends on a representative Direct involvement


Fear and ignorance


Courage and knowledge
Punitive model is broken Evaluate and replace with alternative sentencing
All of society pays for prisons and associated costs - lousy return on the dollar Society pays for treatment and resolution - better return on the dollar

the "return on the dollar" is often not to society, but to the victim