Talk:Responsibility assumption
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
..Unitarian Universalist denominations have belief systems...
Saying anything definite aobut UU belief systems seems like a stretch.
[edit] Buddhist Metaphysics
I believe Buddhist metaphysics neatly unties this sea of knots. My intuition tells him the key is in the doctrine of emptiness, but its beyond me right now to set it out. Can someone help?
- It seems people only untie this knot by becoming enlightened--whatever that is--and that all known doctrines only take one so-far. I suggest you explore binary plenum networks. This would be a network between two sets, one set organized by everything-the-same and the other by everything-is-different. By example, if you had thousands of alphabet blocks, you would have two maximal ways of organizing them: (1) piles of 26 letters each containing A-Z (all piles the same); (2) piles each of a specific letter, piles "A" through "Z" (all piles different). The interesting thing about (1) --everything-the-same-- is that such a set would seem empty by some measures. That is, no pile can easily be distinguished from the others if all piles look the same. This leads to the possibility of things in awareness that are not really empty but just initially seem so. An experience such as, I-am-creating-reality, which seems empty--at best--may in fact be loaded with awareness. WikiLen 21:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- It would be great to have stuff like this in Wikipedia, but it is both speculative and original research on my part and as such does not belong. Your request, "Can somenone help?" should unfortunately be answered "No" as you are--in my opinion--asking for knowledge that has not been written yet. A Wikibook might be the place for such knowledge to show up. WikiLen 21:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] re Total Responsibility
I removed this sentence as original research:
- They point to offsetting benefits if such a causation system is true, such as the absence of personal sacrifice and interpersonal guilt, or the absolute safety such a system portends for the causative mind.
And this sentence, also as original research:
- In its absolute form, this doctrine approaches solipsism (the notion that only oneself exists), and strictly from this perspective causation may, perhaps, correctly be termed solipsistic.
Neither sentence is supported by the references I located. — WikiLen 03:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
