Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Zen-master/Proposed decision
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[From main page]
-
- 5 votes is the requisite majority, not 4, right? The other arbcom members on this case aren't gonna vote? No explanation/further discussion of the issue(s) I presume? zen master T 15:47, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- This is an old case and we have both lost and gained arbitrators, but the new ones are not responsible for this case. Fred Bauder 17:03, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- So this case is going out with a fizzle? rather anti-climatic. So no arbitrators care about even discussing further an apparent racist method of presentation on wikipedia? Where did user Neutrality go? zen master T 17:30, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- This is an old case and we have both lost and gained arbitrators, but the new ones are not responsible for this case. Fred Bauder 17:03, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- 5 votes is the requisite majority, not 4, right? The other arbcom members on this case aren't gonna vote? No explanation/further discussion of the issue(s) I presume? zen master T 15:47, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Neutrality remains active Fred Bauder 18:33, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
