Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Aranda56 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ok I want this forgotten and deleted please, I accpeted that RFA foolishly --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 06:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Please, I'm leaving wikipedia unless this RFA is deleted. Bye --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 06:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

It's not going to happen. You're a great editor, and it'll be a loss. But it won't happen. NSLE _(T+C) 06:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comment

I find this pattern rather irritating. Each month Aranda56 is up to adminship, can't stand some criticism and withdraws. Very strange quircks for a future admin.

My advice to you is made of two parts.

• Wait please, two or three months before submitting your nomination again.
• Do not bail out at the first sign of trouble. Yeah, there is criticism, RFA is a popularity content in a sense, but hang on. Plenty of people pass the RfA nomination with 90 votes for them and 5-10 votes against. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

The main reason that I accpeted the 4th and 5th RFA was because of my internet acess, which is AOL, I was way too impatient with all these autoblocks and I needed adminship no matter what, which is WP:POINT. I really have no intrest in becoming a admin as I think that leads to burnout easily and I'm scared of adminship powers knowing that I may abuse it when I get it, and I'm scared of the critism as well. I quickly got new internet service, now I have Comcast which is a more static IP and I see no need for adminship, I want this RFA deleted if possible.--Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 18:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

It is impossible to have this deleted, it should stay there for future reference. I would doubt it would qualify for Wikipedia:Speedy deletion. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

And getting criticism is fine. Thre are a few of us who thrive under criticism. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)