Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example admin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this sysop and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with ~~~~~}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 02:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC).

Please note: This template is for listing disputes about actions that are limited to administrators only, specifically these actions:

• protecting and unprotecting pages
• deleting and undeleting pages
• blocking and unblocking users

For all other matters (such as edit wars and page moves), please use the template at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example user.

---

• (Example user | talk | contributions)

---

Contents 1 Statement of the dispute 1.1 Desired outcome 1.2 Description 1.3 Powers misused 1.4 Applicable policies 1.5 Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute 1.6 Users certifying the basis for this dispute 1.7 Other users who endorse this statement 2 Response 3 Outside view 4 Discussion

[edit] Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this administrator's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

[edit] Desired outcome

This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly what the changes they'd like to see in the user, or what questions of behavior should be the focus.

[edit] Description

Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it.

[edit] Powers misused

• Protection (log):

1. {list page or pages protected}

• Deletion (log):

1. {list page or pages deleted}

• Blocking (log):

1. {list user or users blocked}

[edit] Applicable policies

• Protection policy

1. {explain violation of protection policy here}

• Deletion policy

1. {explain violation of deletion policy here}

• Blocking policy

1. {explain violation of blocking policy here}

[edit] Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

[edit] Users certifying the basis for this dispute

(sign with ~~~~)

[edit] Other users who endorse this statement

(sign with ~~~~)

[edit] Response

This is a summary written by the sysop whose actions are disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the sysop's actions did not violate policy. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

[edit] Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

[edit] Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page.