Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Sobrider

[edit] Sobrider

• Sobrider (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• SanosukeGJ (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Lytnngseed (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Makegodscringe (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• sav2880 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 24.29.7.85 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)

In the deletion discussion for Game junkie, Sobrider has been the most adamant defender of keeping the article. Recently, the other listed users began voting and commenting in the discussion with a style similar to Sobrider's writing, and whose only contributions have been to either the deletion discussion or the Game junkie article. Requesting a check to see if these accounts are socks or not. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 07:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Clerk note: This falls under #2 (obvious) and #3 (throwaway) of the policy at the top of the page. The AfD closing admin can rightly discount or ignore the comments of these users without technical proof. Thatcher131 (talk) 12:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Declined unless this spreads elsewhere. Mackensen (talk) 01:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)