Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nikkul
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Nikkul
- Nikkul (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Indianhilbilly (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- XavierIcI (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- huniebunie (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Coollemonade (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Bangalorevenkat (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser) Added by Saravask 02:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Khazadum (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser) Added by Saravask 02:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Code letter: D
User:Fowler&fowler has asked me to investigate a case of possible sockpuppeteering at User talk:Aksi great#Concern 3. After initial investigations, I think there is enough evidence to prove sockpuppeteering. These users were involved in vote-stacking at a consensus measuring vote held here. They have similar areas of interest. I filed this request mainly to see if there is any technical evidence to prove that Indianhilbilly is a sockpuppet of Nikkul. Aksi great (talk) 17:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please see this discussion as well. Thanks. Saravask 19:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Please check this soon. I've been wondering too, especially about those four users, and I am not even against them in a content dispute. Those four users may be considered meatpuppets in any case. However, I doubt User:Bangalorevenkat is a sockpuppet. Also, User:Coollemonade seems unlikely. Nor User:Khazadum. But we should really find out soon. The Behnam 18:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Where are the diffs? The Behnam 00:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- It might be noted that the main four users all have an obsession with adding this picture to the article. Kind of fishy. The Behnam 00:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Confirmed except with regard to Khazadum. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 03:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.