Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mobile 01

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mobile 01}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Mobile 01

  • Code Letter: NONE, I am not sure. I need someone's help here, and no admin is willing to step in and settle this finally. This is a complex case. It does not clearly fit in any of the 6 categories. Please see user:travb/m regarding User:Mobile 01, his two alleged sockpuppets, and his several anon accounts. Best wishes, Travb (talk) 22:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note: Fixed up this case by using the correct format. Travb needs to do a bit more work adding evidence to this page. DarthVader 12:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm...I just found out the corporate office of Bridgestone was editing the Firestone page 5 minutes before LucaZ (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser) was created: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mobile 01 and Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard[1]
The corporate office deleted the same material as User:Mobile 01. I will let you know what will happen. Best wishes, Travb (talk) 13:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined. Accounts too old to check. Mackensen (talk) 01:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.