Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Lee Nysted

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Lee Nysted}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


[edit] Lee Nysted

  • Code letter: C

New sock in this case seems to have popped up. Was continually reverting the sock tag on Huntress (possibly others, didn't check), and now is fighting on my page about it. It may just be meatpuppetry, so I would like a checkuser to look at this. ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to MeNeutrality Project ) 18:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
I will obviously be recusing myself from clerk activities related to this case.

Confirmed as same IP as Huntress. Also:
  1. Billybobsteak (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
--jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 22:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)



[edit] Lee Nysted

  • Code letter: C (has promised to continue recreating hoaxish vanity articles), D

What appears to be blatant sockpuppetry in a hoax article is creating some seriously bad blood between valid contributors: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lee Nysted Experience, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nysted Music. The user has a history of creating vanity articles, and his character, as seen online, is quite questionable. I would normally not have thought a checkuser necessary, but one user has strongly objected to my classification of the situation, and I'd like to clear some things up. Patstuarttalk|edits 18:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Another one for the list, and a recusal from clerking activities since I'm submitting it.

Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to MeNeutrality Project ) 18:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: BillWSmith is a regular; I'm a bit surprised as his support, but I don't think he's Lee. Patstuarttalk|edits 18:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Specifically I think Lee is an unrelated SPA, and that the others are socks of Bill. I may of course be wrong though. CU will tell. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to MeNeutrality Project ) 18:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Confirmed for Lee Nysted, Huntress829, also:
No connections found for Smdewart or Chicago60607 other than physical proximity. No connection found for BillWSmith. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.