Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hagiographer

[edit] Hagiographer

• Hagiographer (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• BlackApe (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

BlackApe's username and first edit are arguably racist, and likely refers to User:SquealingPig, an attack account allegedly created by User:Zapatancas to attack SqeakBox. His second edit redirects Roberto Weiss to User:SqueakBox; Weiss is SqueakBox's grandfather and a frequent target of Zapatancas/Hagiographer/Squeakbox conflict. If checkuser establishes a connection, can one of the clerks drop a week-long block on Hagiographer per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas#Log of blocks and bans. Thanks. Thatcher131 22:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Possible, but slightly unlikely. Mackensen (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

• Hmm. What about Zapatancas (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser), or is he too old? Also look at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Zapatancas. Even though Zapatancas and Hagiographer edit from different ISPs, Hagiographer's behavior toward Squeakbox led the community to endorse Tony Sidaway's proposal to extend Zapatancas' probation to Hagiographer. If he's not the same person, its an odd coincidence of editing interests. If he is the same person, and has found a way to avoid technical confirmation, that kind of scuttles the arbitration remedies on his side. Thanks either way. Thatcher131 12:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • If there are reasons to suspect apart from technical evidence, then I'd say it's pretty unlikely we're dealing with two different people. Mackensen (talk) 14:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)