Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ehinger222

See also Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rugby 666

[edit] Ehinger222

• Ehinger222 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 147.10.112.157 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
• Okay that does not make sense (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Tenuous_walker (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Caesar34 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Rugby 666 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter: F

This editor's contribs bear remarkable similarities to a series of edits made by user:Ehinger222 around the end of August, in particular POV pushing over the naming of rugby league and football (soccer) - see [[1]] and [[2]]; slandering of Alan Oakley for the supposed crime of being anti-rugby league - see [[3]] and [[4]].

user:Okay that does not make sense hopped on and simply reverted a number of edits i made to articles that user:147.10.112.157 had contributed to beforehand - see contribs for 147.10.112.157 and Okay that does not make sense. Clearly (IMO) the same person.

Once User:147.10.112.157 was blocked, user user:Tenuous_walker and user:Caesar34 popped up making similar edits.

user:Rugby 666 popped up a couple of days after user:ehinger222 stopped editing. He/she edited almost solely rugby league related articles for the best part of a month until he/she saw fit to join in similar edit wars to the above named editors.

After user:147.10.112.157 and User:Caesar34 were both blocked for a week - the former for npov warring and the latter for block evasion user:Rugby 666 became the "current" account for this sockpuppeteer - he/she hops from account to account as others are blocked, and jumps into the same old wars.

Apparently user:Rugby 666 didn't much like me alleging that he/she is a sockpuppet, and removed his/her username from this page [[5]], removed the warning from his/her userpage [[6]], and accused me of vandalism [[7]] (misusing the template vandal template in the process). This is consistent with the behaviour of sockpuppets of User:Licinius and User:NSWelshman- to wit, see User:J is me's history: [[8]], and User:Factoid Killer's as well: [[9]].

I suspect, owing to very similar manner and interests that this sockpuppeteer is the same as both Licinius (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log • rfcu) and NSWelshman (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log). Though without going through with a fine tooth comb I admit it may be somewhat difficult to tie this down. Dibo ^{T | C} 12:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

This is a very tedious accusation that does not actually outline the case or the interaction between us. Dibo just accused me of being a sockpuppet even though I was well established before the original accusations were even created. I have stated elsewhere that this type of boring stuff is ruining wikipedia for me, but if an administrator desires a proper defense, please only ask as I am more than willing to make one if it ends Dibo's constant vandalism of my user page! --Rugby 666 02:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Note: I'm looking at this now; results in a bit. Dmcdevit·t 04:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Inconclusive regarding Ehinger222; the account is too old.

Confirmed all the rest are the same, as well as Freddie 34 (talk • contribs), Raezar34 (talk • contribs), and Chuq Hater (talk • contribs). Dmcdevit·t 09:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)