Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Ilyanep

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Ilyanep

Hi, I've been a sysop here for about 6 months (If I remember correctly) and would like to request becoming a bereaucrat. I doubt if I will be promoting too many people (seeing as nobody here except me gets any sleep), but I'd like to help out in the case where help is needed. I typically avoid arguments and edit wars, and I try to occasionally write new articles from scratch...but that's beside the point, I think. Ilyanep 22:35, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support

1. From one sysop to another. --Merovingian ↕ T@Lk 16:28, Jun 14, 2004 (UTC)
2. Warofdreams 18:00, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
3. Support. --"DICK" CHENEY 19:24, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
4. Sure, why not. Snowspinner 20:08, Jun 14, 2004 (UTC)
5. If you want more boring responsibility, there's no reason why you shouldn't have it. :) —No-One Jones 22:34, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
6. Support, sv� not? --[[User:�var Arnfj�r<eth> Bjarmason|�var Arnfj�r<eth> Bjarmason]] 21:15, 2004 Jun 15 (UTC)
7. Cribcage 13:22, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
8. David Gerard 13:33, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
9. Sounds good to me. Neutrality 16:24, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
10. JCarriker 01:34, Jun 17, 2004 (UTC)
11. Jwrosenzweig 18:11, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
12. Seems decent, even-handed and even-tempered. Cecropia | Talk 14:34, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
13. 172 18:59, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
14. Danny 01:48, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
15. Lst27 03:43, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

1. 172 09:37, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC) Seems to have a black/white view of conflict. Users who share his political biases are never in the wrong to him, while users who see things differently to him are never acting in good faith.

The only argument I have ever had with you was about the addition to the beginning of an article having to do with the Soviet Union almost half a year ago. I do not think that that is a basis to form a fair judgement of me. Furthermore, people who share my so-called "political biases" are criticised by me too when I see the need (in that case I saw the need to critisize you, but not for the revision of the article, but for your very condescending and uncivil conduct [And by the way, the reference was provided and you still dismissed the edits to the article]). But that's beside the point, and I really do not wish to hold an everlasting grudge against you if you stop acting in such a manner as you have. Ilyanep 14:23, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

You're right. It is not a basis to form a fair judgment of you. That is why I am not using it as a basis. Rather, I oppose your candidacy because I have long gotten the impression that you've been harboring a nasty grudge, which is not a characteristic one wants to see in a nominee for admin or bureaucrat status. Recently, for example, you joined in on some personal attacks on a request for comments page (started by other users with transparently political motivations) and posted some nasty comments about on the mailing list. I saw these as signs that you were harboring a grudge. Otherwise, I would've long forgotten the conflict that you'd mentioned. 172 14:48, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I do not remember posting anything on a mailing list, but one short comment on a Request for Comments page...and I have seen a few revert wars that you have been captured in. If this looked like a grudge I was holding against you then my sincerest apologies to you. Ilyanep 17:40, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I guess that I meant the quickpolls. I saw that you crossed out your comments there. I'll do the same. 172 18:55, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)