Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Wareware/Proposed decision
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
all proposed
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
- Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
- Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
- Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.
On this case, no Arbitrators are recused and 9 are inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.
- For all items
Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
Contents |
[edit] Motions and requests by the parties
Place those on the discussion page.
[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed orders}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed final decision
[edit] Proposed principles
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed findings of fact
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed enforcement
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators
[edit] General
[edit] Motion to close
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.
Given that Wareware hasn't edited for months and appears to have left Wikipedia, and considering the recent onslaught of cases to arbitrate, I move to close the case subject to immediate reactivation if Wareware returns. Neutralitytalk 05:30, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
-
- Neutralitytalk 05:30, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
- (noting that $months == 2) -- Grunt ҈ 14:26, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)
- →Raul654 10:12, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC) - concur with the above
- ➥the Epopt 17:57, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)