Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Internodeuser/Evidence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and be concise. Long, rambling, or stream-of-conciousness rants are not helpful.

As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use this form: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anomalous_phenomenon&diff=5587219&oldid=5584644] [1].

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.

Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which illustrate behavior which relates to the issues.

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence in your own section and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.

Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.

Contents


[edit] Evidence presented by {your user name}

[edit] <day1> <month>

  • <timestamp1>
    • What happened.
  • <timestamp2>
    • What happened.
  • <timestamp3>
    • What happened.

[edit] <day2> <month>

  • <timestamp1>
    • What happened.
  • <timestamp2>
    • What happened.
  • <timestamp3>
    • What happened.


[edit] Evidence presented by Longhair

[edit] 20 May 2005

  • Unprovoked personal attacks on myself from Internodeuser
  • [2]"You may quite possibly be the stupidest person in existence".
  • [3]"If you don't stop being a power-mad prick, then you will be deleted forever. This user is becoming more of a vandal every day."
  • [4] "That's not vandalism, you morons".
  • Unprovoked personal attacks on Gamaliel from Internodeuser
  • [5] "See the FACTUAL statements on your own talk page, moron".
  • [6] "You're an idiot. And I am beginning to think all administrators here are. Stupid project".
  • Unprovoked personal attack on Tony Sidaway from Internodeuser
  • [7] "Congratulations on spreading malicious lies about everything that you could think of, whilst contributing to idiocy throughout the planet."
  • Unprovoked personal attack on The Anome from Internodeuser
  • [8] "You are a moron. Congratulations."
  • Unprovoked personal attack on Clarkk from Internodeuser
  • [9] "You're a moron Clarkk... Power-mad control freak.."

[edit] 22 May 2005

  • Unprovoked personal attacks on myself from Internodeuser
  • [10]" it is longhair here who is a serial vandal".

[edit] 23 May 2005

  • Unprovoked personal attacks on AYArktos

In response to the edit[11] of Alice Springs where AYArktos explains what she was doing on the talk page so that other editors (even new editors) would understand she had not deleted material but requested citation of sources[12].

  • [13] " Bad job Ayarktos for being a vandal".
  • [14] " Some people are silly".
  • [15] " Ooh, such a scandal! I was pointing out how stupid people on Wikipedia (as you seem to be one of) had been targetting me for such ridiculous reasons. This stuff is true of course, but its not referenced. But it just goes to show, that wherever you go, idiots will be there. Thank you. Always nice to have a true idiot pointed out.".
  • [16] " Check out the references. Bet you feel like an absolute tool now AYArktos".
  • [17] " Major edits that were reversed, reinstated, with abuse and personal attacks thrown in: Alice Springs - abuse by AYArktos, who was also abusive on Port Arthur Massacre and Martin Bryant".
note: Port Arthur Massacre the only edit AYArktos made was to disambiguate New Town. Martin Bryant - her edits in this article were only to do with media treatment of Bryant (referenced!) - not a topic the user was writing on at the time.
Having had that pointed out to him, the user has removed the reference linking AYArktos to abusing the later two articles from his talk page. His assertion that she personally attacked him in connection with the Alice Springs article still stands.

[edit] 24 May 2005

  • Unprovoked personal attacks on myself from Internodeuser
  • [18] "You ARE a liar!"
  • [19] "You work with police? Inwhat context? -or are you one of their regular "clients"?"
  • Threats of legal action from Internodeuser towards myself and the Wikimedia Foundation
  • [20] "I should report you for slander"
  • [21] "If this dispute does not end in a positive outcome (Which is that Longhair and others cease their abusive behaviours) then I shall be forced to take legal action, either against Longhair or against Wikipedia."
  • Bad faith VfD nomination from Internodeuser.

Nominating a self-created article for deletion then voting to Keep the article.

  • [22] "I don't think that this page should be deleted"

[edit] 26 May 2005

  • Unprovoked personal attack on Thebainer from Internodeuser
  • [23] "Yet another example of lies being told by administrators.".
  • Bad faith VfD nomination from Internodeuser.
[24] *Clearly a bogus nomination made in bad faith. Delisted for that reason.
-comment made by Tannin in closing the VfD with votes at 20/0 for Keep.

[edit] 28 May 2005

  • As of May 28 2005, the user page of User:Internodeuser details false accusations against myself and several other editors with no evidence to support the claims.

[edit] 29 May 2005

  • Further threats of legal action from Internodeuser towards the Wikimedia Foundation
  • [25]I hope that you forever purge anything to do with my identity. If you are curious as to why you should do that, then look at libel for a moment. What you have said here about me is a lie. You have defamed me by doing it. And with my IP you can identify me. You should be very careful if you are thinking of keeping it, for you could get in to one hell of a lot of legal trouble.'

[edit] Evidence presented by MacGyverMagic

[edit] May 24 2005

I do not understand what your rationale was for supporting Longhair in 3 entirely different places, and ignoring blatantly obvious references that proved his guilt in the matter. What was your rationale for it? What makes him so special, or alternatively what makes me someone who deserves such attacks? 203.26.206.129 12:32, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
    • This was in response to Longhair's post on WP:AN/I. I made comments showing I believed Longhair, mainly because he was able to submit evidence as shown above. I have not seen any evidence of the personal attacks that Longhair is claimed to have made nor has Internodeuser provided such info.
  • [27]
    • "Once again, I have only ever responded to people, never initiated any attacks." With this comment, Internodeuser admits attacking others under provocation. But again evidence of such provocation is missing. Mgm|(talk) 23:04, May 27, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Evidence presented by Thebainer

[edit] 20 May 2005

  • At 05:03:
    • [29]: response to Ambi's welcome message - "There you go. That's fair. Delete the rest of it, because its lies and hatemongering by malicious power-mad control freaks."
  • At 05:04:
    • [30]: personal attack on Postdlf - "I am pretty sure it was you stupid administrators that were adding the nonsense to things that I was adding, not me."
  • At 17:26:
    • [31]: personal attack on Gamaliel - "So what are you, the dumbest person on the planet?"
  • At 17:28:
    • [32]: personal attack on Longhair - "You're the problem, dickweed."

[edit] 24 May 2005

  • At 15:03:
    • [33]: personal attack on Longhair - "You work with police? Inwhat context? -or are you one of their regular "clients"?"
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_arbitration_Internodeuser_Evidence_05f4.html"