Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deltabeignet/Proposed decision
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
all proposed
After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other Arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop, arbitrators may place proposals which are ready for voting here.
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
- Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
- Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
- Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if they so choose. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.
On this case, 11 Arbitrators are active and none are recused, so 6 votes are a majority.
- For all items
Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
Contents |
[edit] Motions and requests by the parties
Place those on /Workshop.
[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed orders}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed orders}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed orders}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed orders}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed orders}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed orders}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed final decision
[edit] Proposed principles
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed findings of fact
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed enforcement
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators
[edit] General
I made the following agreement to Deltabeignet, and he agreed [1]. As a show of good will, his IP (static and unshared) which was used for the anonymous edits has been soft-blocked so that he can only edit with his account. Deltabeignet has already admitted it and promised not to repeat the behavior. This informal agreement is sufficient for me, and we can reopen the case if the problem resurfaces again. Dmcdevit·t 21:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Motion to close
[edit] Implementation notes
Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.
[edit] Vote
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.
-
- Close per my comments. Dmcdevit·t 21:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Close. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 08:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Close. Agree that Deltabeignet can be given a chance to edit without remedies for now. Can reopen if needed. FloNight 10:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Close. Kirill Lokshin 13:47, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Close Fred Bauder 14:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Close. jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 15:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)