Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DarrenRay and 2006BC/Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

all proposed

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop place proposals which are ready for voting here.

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

  • Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
  • Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
  • Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if she/he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, no Arbitrators are recused and 5 are inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

Contents

[edit] Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on /Workshop.

[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed final decision

[edit] Proposed principles

[edit] Editing by participants in an external event

1) If the subject of a Wikipedia article is a contemporary external event, participants in that event may be banned from editing that and related articles.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 18:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 23:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. Charles Matthews 15:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. Dmcdevit·t 07:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  6. Neutralitytalk 17:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] NPOV

2) Wikipedia:Neutral point of view prohibits biased editing.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 18:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 23:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. Charles Matthews 15:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. Dmcdevit·t 07:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  6. Neutralitytalk 17:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed findings of fact

[edit] Locus of case

1) The locus of the case is University of Melbourne Student Union#Voluntary liquidation and related articles.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 18:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 23:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. Charles Matthews 15:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. Dmcdevit·t 07:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  6. Neutralitytalk 17:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] DarrenRay and 2006BC are participants in an event which is the subject of a Wikipedia article

2) DarrenRay and 2006BC are participants in University of Melbourne Student Union#Voluntary liquidation, see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DarrenRay and 2006BC/Evidence#Collaborative edit-warring by suspected sockpuppets; AChan is a friend of Darren Ray, see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DarrenRay and 2006BC/Evidence#Collaborative edit-warring by suspected sockpuppets.

Support:
  1. James F. (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. Fred Bauder 15:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 23:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. Charles Matthews 15:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. Dmcdevit·t 07:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  6. Neutralitytalk 17:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Tendentious editing by DarrenRay, 2006BC and AChan

3) DarrenRay, 2006BC, and AChan, have engaged in aggressive point of view editing of University of Melbourne Student Union#Voluntary liquidation and related articles, see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DarrenRay and 2006BC/Evidence#DarrenRay, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DarrenRay and 2006BC/Evidence#2006BC, and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DarrenRay and 2006BC/Evidence#AChan.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 18:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 23:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. Charles Matthews 15:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. Dmcdevit·t 07:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  6. Neutralitytalk 17:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

[edit] DarrenRay, 2006BC and AChan banned from Dean McVeigh and related articles

1) DarrenRay (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log), 2006BC (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) and AChan (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) are banned indefinitely from editing Dean McVeigh, Melbourne University student organisations, University of Melbourne Student Union, and any related article.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 18:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 23:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. Charles Matthews 15:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. Dmcdevit·t 07:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  6. Neutralitytalk 17:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed enforcement

[edit] Enforcement by block

1) Should DarrenRay, 2006BC, or AChan violate the ban imposed by this decision they may be blocked up to a month on the first offense, up to a year on the second offense, and up to indefinite on subsequent offenses.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 18:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 23:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. Charles Matthews 15:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. Dmcdevit·t 07:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  6. Neutralitytalk 17:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators

[edit] General

[edit] Motion to close

[edit] Implementation notes

Clerks and arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

  • All pass, unanimous support. Dmcdevit·t 07:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vote

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

  1. Close ➥the Epopt 13:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. Close Fred Bauder 05:08, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
  3. Close. Neutralitytalk 17:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  4. Back to close again, neither have edited since March, no reason to wait. Dmcdevit·t 23:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  1. Close. James F. (talk) 22:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Hold off pending further discussion. James F. (talk) 07:49, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. Close. Dmcdevit·t 07:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Willing to listen to further proposals. Dmcdevit·t 08:24, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_arbitration_DarrenRay_and_2006BC_Proposed_decision_863f.html"