Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Copperchair/Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

all proposed

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop place proposals which are ready for voting here.

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

  • Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
  • Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
  • Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, no Arbitrators are recused and 5 are inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

Contents

[edit] Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on /Workshop.

[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Temporary ban on Copperchair editing

1) As Copperchair has continued to edit war on a number of articles pending resolution of this matter, he is banned from editing any pages other then these Arbitration pages and his own user and talk page. He may be briefly blocked should he edit any other page.

Enacted on 16:26, December 5, 2005

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 16:09, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 16:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  3. James F. (talk) 19:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 19:34, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  5. User:Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 19:35, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  6. Kelly Martin (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  7. Jayjg (talk) 22:44, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed final decision

[edit] Proposed principles

[edit] Consensus

1) Wikipedia:Consensus requires a good faith effort by users to communicate with each other in order to negotiate solutions which meet the needs of the users of Wikipedia.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 16:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 16:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Mackensen (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Dmcdevit·t 07:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Charles Matthews 10:01, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. Jayjg (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. James F. (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Obsession

2) Users who display rigid or obsessional editing behavior may be fully or partially banned from editing.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 16:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 16:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Mackensen (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Dmcdevit·t 07:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Charles Matthews 10:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. Jayjg (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. James F. (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed findings of fact

[edit] Star Wars

1) Copperchair has fixed, non-negotiable views regarding editing of articles which relate to Star Wars, see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Copperchair/Evidence#Evidence presented in response by Copperchair where he openly expresses those views, explicitly rejecting consensus decision making.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 16:27, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 16:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Mackensen (talk) 19:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Dmcdevit·t 07:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Charles Matthews 10:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. Jayjg (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. James F. (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] War on Terrorism

2) Copperchair has a fixed idea that information regarding the Iraq War should not be included in War on Terrorism, see [1] and Talk:War on Terrorism#Iraq war-only information doesn't belong here.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 17:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 16:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Mackensen (talk) 19:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Dmcdevit·t 07:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Jayjg (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. James F. (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:
  1. Charles Matthews 10:03, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit warring

3) Copperchair has engaged in edit warring on War on Terrorism and multiple Star Wars-related articles in an attempt to enforce these views. [2] [3] [4] [5]

Support:
  1. Dmcdevit·t 07:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Fred Bauder 17:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Charles Matthews 10:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Jayjg (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. James F. (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

[edit] Copperchair banned from Star Wars

1) Copperchair is banned indefinitely from editing articles which relate to Star Wars.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 16:52, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 16:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Mackensen (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Dmcdevit·t 07:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Charles Matthews 10:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. Jayjg (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. James F. (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Copperchair banned from War on Terrorism

2) Copperchair is banned indefinitely from editing articles which relate to War on Terrorism.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 17:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 16:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Mackensen (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Dmcdevit·t 07:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. James F. (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
  1. Charles Matthews 10:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Abstain:
  1. Jayjg (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copperchair placed on Probation

3) Copperchair is placed indefinitely on Wikipedia:Probation. Any administrator may ban him indefinitely from any article which he disrupts by aggressive editing. Any three administrators may impose a partial or general ban up to and including an indefinite ban for good cause documented at a section at the bottom of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Copperchair#Documentation of bans.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 17:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 16:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Mackensen (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Dmcdevit·t 07:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Charles Matthews 10:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. Jayjg (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. James F. (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed enforcement

[edit] Enforcement by block

1) Should Copperchair (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) edit any article from which he is banned, he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated offenses. After 5 blocks the maximum block shall increase to one year.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 16:52, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 16:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Mackensen (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Dmcdevit·t 07:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Charles Matthews 10:06, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:58, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. Jayjg (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. James F. (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators

[edit] General

[edit] Motion to close

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

  1. All done here. Dmcdevit·t 00:04, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Yes. James F. (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Close. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Close Fred Bauder 00:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Close Charles Matthews 10:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Close. Jayjg (talk) 18:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_arbitration_Copperchair_Proposed_decision_b09a.html"