Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/truelife

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Truelife

Voice your opinion. Template:RfA/Stat Ending 06:17:12 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Truelife (talk • contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Truelife 06:17, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I glady accept to participate as a candidate for being selected as administrator.


I might not have been on Wikipedia for as long as most users may have been, but i honestly do not believe that such a subjective matter would influence my capability of how the site works. With recent clashes with editors (sure that may seem bad), but from that i've only learnt more and more and from those mistakes, i now truly understand the concepts of the site, along with all its rules, policies and functions.

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: My main focus is to facilitate the accuracy of the site by removing articles which may seem erroneous or contain erroneous data/information. The deletion of vanity articles as well as articles which do not provide sufficient or reinforcing data will be deleted. Overall, whatever roles/choires which are bestowed on me as an administrator, i will gladly accept and fullfill with enthusiasm.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: I know this may seem conceited of me, but one of my favourite articles is "Trinity Catholic College". The article is based on a secondary school in Australia and provides all relevant details and facts which will assist with all areas. I've included accurate information as well as reinforcing links and details so that researchers obtain a reliable understanding. Practically, the article consists of all the essentials in which a reader needs to know about the topic.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: To be completley honest, yes i have recently been in an editing conflict with an editor. The edit i made was completely reasonable, but was neglected by the editor. After providing the editor with confirmation and links, the edit dispute was resolved and everything remainded perfect. When dealing with conflicts, i try to stay on a reasonable level without aggression. I believe the best way to deal with edit conflicts it to negotiate with the editor or writer and to have a clear understanding of which articles are FAKE and which are REAL.
General comments
  • I enjoy wikipedia and by upgrading to this level, as corny and fake as it seems, i will share my amusement with others.

Discussion (for expressing views without numbering)

Support

Oppose

Neutral

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_adminship_truelife_9b93.html"