Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/the truth from texas

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] the truth from texas

Final (0/3/0); Ended 17:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

the truth from texas (talk • contribs) – I am an active Wikipedian and am comitted to catching and eliminating any vandalism. I have reverted a few vandals, and could have reverted more, however, AntiVandalBot reverted the vandals while I was reverting them. I also would use my powers wisely. Thanks!. The truth from texas 22:31, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

I accept the nomination for administrator.

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A:I anticipate to mainly help with reverting vandalism, and geting rid of vandals, as well as perform all other tasks associated with sysop privliges.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:I am most pleased with my edits to revert vandalism, hovever, I must say that I am also pleased with the 3 articles I started, including Hat World, Orlando Police Department, and Motorola V170

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:The only conflicts I have had were being too slow to revert vandalism, which was instead reverted by AntiVandalBot. I expect to use the popup tool to solve this problem. No other users have caused me stress.

General comments

• Has 24 edits. — Arjun 22:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose, very weak answers to the questions, and has only 24 edits. Withdraw very much recommended — Arjun 22:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
2. Oppose I'm sorry but 24 edits is simply not enough. TSO1D 22:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
3. Oppose - you should withdraw. You only have 24 edits. Many people don't even succeed with 2,000. TeckWiz^TalkContribs_@ 22:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.