Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/eggwo

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] eggwo

Final (0/6/0); Ended 23:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

eggwo (talk • contribs) - would like to become a wikipedia admin. Very smart, and was a Harvard graduate Eggwo 21:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I accept this nomination to become a Wikipedia sysop

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I would like to clarify pages, along with stopping vandalism and copyright.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: I woul not say i am very pleased with this article, but more pleased with it than others: AS50. I felt that by specifying certain aspects of the weapon, readers will immediately know its specifications.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Once or twice, I made some silly articles (well...i had forgotten to log out, and one of my friends did) but i have since tried to help other pages. I will not allow anyone on my user name-and if so, i will speedily delete the page(s)

General comments

• See eggwo's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose, obviously. Clearly a disruptive sockpuppet; check out the page history of Gabe Frese, the nonsensical personal attack page he created less than an hour ago. Kafziel ^Talk 21:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
2. Oppose and suggest snowballing this request, I'm not a editcountitis fiend, but a total of 13 edits, six of which are due to this... nope. The Rambling Man 21:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
3. Oppose no way can I support this, per above and he can't get his header formed right, which I corrected. VERY poor answers too.Rlevse
4. Hah. Close RfA and block user for disruption, which apart from Gabe Frese (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) includes wasting our time here. Sandstein 22:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
5. Oppose I don't think you're ready, even if you claim to be a Harvard grad it has nothing to do with RfA, no offense. Darthgriz⁹⁸ 22:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
6. Strong Oppose I don't think a new user like this should even try to become an admin. And also as per above. Nol888_(Talk) 22:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.