Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Wooyi

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Wooyi

Voice your opinion Final (1/4/0); Ended 02:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Wooyi (talk • contribs) - Wooyi has been editing wikipedia for a long time, and regularly makes new pages. Wooyi 01:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept the nomination I withdraw the nomination

Wooyi 02:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: Hmm, wikifying, deleting nonsensical entries, and improve article qualities, I guess.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:I don't really have anything specific to say here, but generally I am pleased with my contribution here in the field of literature/arts.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:Except for the copyright issues when I was a newcomer, nothing much.

General comments

• See Wooyi's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion

Support

1. Moral support to aviod pile-on. Mostly inactive before this month and weak answers to questions. –Llama man 02:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose per the answers to the questions, implys that admin tools aren't needed. Sorry :/ ~ Arjun 02:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
2. Oppose. While well-meaning, the candidate obviously lacks sufficient knowledge and experience, as evidenced by his/her poor responses to the questions and failure to properly set up this RfA before listing it. FYI, Wooyi, wikifying and improving articles aren't sysop chores. —David Levy 02:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
3. Strong Oppose/Suggest Withdrawal per lack of edits and it beign malformed the first time. Plus weak answers. Improve your edits and try again in 6 months or so.Wizardman 02:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
4. Suggest Withdrawal - administrators typically have thousands of edits and a varied base of contributions. You may want to reconsider applying at some point in the future after several months of heavy activity. Also, please note, that for most of what you said you want to do, you don't actually need to be an admin. You can cleanup articles without being an admin and you can tag articles for deletion that meet the criteria for speedy deletion without being an admin. --BigDT 02:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.