Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tregoweth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
[edit] Tregoweth
Vote here (47/0/1) ending 05:27 October 18, 2005 (UTC)
Tregoweth (talk • contribs) – A HUGE help in helping slay vandals, especially in light of the all-out assault by the troll nicknamed "Mascot Guy." Great work, great fun and a great asset to this site. Please support! - Lucky 6.9 05:27, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept the nomination. tregoweth 06:08, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Support
- Extreme first support vote. I was going to nominate him myself, but I am a lazy slacker and I kept forgetting. Sorry. Gamaliel 06:15, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Strong support. This user has put in an amazing number of edits (not to fall victim to editcountitis, but over 16,000 edits shows strong commitment to the project). I don't see any problems with giving Tregoweth the mop. Ral315 WS 06:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Aw, nuts! I forgot to support my own candidate! - Lucky 6.9 17:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 21:18, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Support OMG 16,000 edits Top VandalSlayer and not a Admin Im in shock --JAranda | watz sup 21:20, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Martin 21:21, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Strong support. Andre (talk) 21:27, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oran e (t) (c) (@) 22:11, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. El_C 22:13, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support CambridgeBayWeather 22:40, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support fellow vandal slayer ≈ jossi fresco ≈ 23:13, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support Private Butcher 23:59, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Christopher Parham (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Kirill Lokshin 00:49, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support, although I am not sure why it took so long. Rje 01:33, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support it's about time --Rogerd 02:32, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support Access to the rollback tool would be a benefit. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:11, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support with the quickness. Proto t c 09:05, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- -- (drini's page|☎) 05:43, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. If drini supports, then you must be a good user.
- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rhetoricalwater (talk • contribs) 14:38, October 14, 2005 UTC.
- Support. --Kbdank71 14:39, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- EXTREME COPYCAT SUPPORT. RfA cliché--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:00, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support I hold any great vandal slayer in high regard, especially this one. Banes 17:02, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, such a cliche, but still quite true: You mean he's not already an admin?! Yes, full Support; level-headed and even-handed and good vandal-fighter. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:17, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. --Fire Star 02:42, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. -- DS1953 05:59, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support if he teaches that picture of Johnson, on his userpage, how to read. ∞Who?¿? 08:15, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support /me hands you a Vorpal Sword of Vandal Slaying +6 ALKIVAR™ 10:52, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Guettarda 13:35, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support Dlyons493 Talk 16:23, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 16:26, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- First-time-ever-voting-on-an-RfA-support ♥purplefeltangel (talk) ♥ (contribs) 18:45, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Absolutely ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 23:11, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support, good work. feydey 23:37, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Get them kid! Shauri smile! 04:56, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support, strong contributer. BD2412 talk 05:06, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support.encephalon 06:06, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Furry Alien Support will make fine admin. Alf melmac 07:08, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- That's hot. Mike H (Talking is hot) 08:44, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. --Anetode 12:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. --Bhadani 13:38, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support -- Francs2000 22:36, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Definite support. +sj + 01:12, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support, good editor and patroller --Saluyot 01:44, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. If I recognise a name on RFA nowadays it must be a good candidate. JFW | T@lk 03:20, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m, +e ] 11:12, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. the wub "?!" 16:25, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Hoary 12:58, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral
- Answers to the questions set below are very short. Astrotrain 21:15, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Did you want War and Peace? Mike H (Talking is hot) 08:45, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- No, but he has written much less than any other candidate, it would have been better to specify what specific areas he was pleased with, and give examples of what conflicts he was involved in. Astrotrain 21:31, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Did you want War and Peace? Mike H (Talking is hot) 08:45, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. A lot of my edits now are housekeeping of one form or another (copyediting, reverting bad edits, watching for vandalism, etc.); I expect as a sysop I would continue this, along with helping other people with speedy deletes, page moves, renames, and all of the other things I've asked of admins. :)
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. Probably my work on categories and disambiguation pages; I'm always pleased when I can make articles easier for someone to find.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A. I have had a few minor conflicts (usually resolved), and some users have caused me stress, but I try to remain calm and reasonable.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.