Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Son of a Peach II

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] SoaP

Voice your opinion! (0/3/1) Ending 9/15/06

Son of a Peach (talk • contribs) – I thought that since it's been some time, I'd drag out my old RfA and see if I'd gotten any better. SoaP 23:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The Downlow

• Edit Count: [1]
• Time Around: Est. 7 July 2006
• Edit Summaries: Mostly all
• Mistakes: Some
• E-mail: Yes
• Userpage: Awesome!
• Any edit warring/blocks?: see for yourself.
• FA participation: None whatsoever

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I hereby accept. SoaP 23:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Comments

• See SoaP's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool.
• See SoaP's edit history with Essjay's Count

 Total edits 600
 Main: 136
 Talk: 19
 User: 128
 User talk: 186
 Wikipedia: 88
 Wikipedia talk: 8
 Image: 8
 Image talk: 0
 Mediawiki: 0
 Mediawiki talk: 7
 Template: 12
 Template talk: 5
 Help: 0
 Help talk: 0
 Category: 2
 Category talk: 0
 Portal: 1
 Portal talk: 0

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose History of trolling, disruption; conduct during the last RfA was un-adminlike. -- tariqabjotu 23:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

   Could you specify my un-adminlike behavior? I really want to help out, but sometimes I get a little goofy... SoaP

2. Strong oppose long history of disruption and trolling from this editor. One month since last unsuccessful RfA which was strongly opposed. Doesn't use meaningful edit summaries. Very inappropriate candidate for adminship. Gwernol 23:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

   Gwernol, will I ever be worthy of the mop? SoaP

3. Oppose per above and suggest speedy close. I rarely oppose but this is not a serious candidacy. Newyorkbrad 23:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Suggest bureaucrat speedily close this RfA hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 23:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

At least give it a chance... SoaP

Comments

For the record, he is now indef blocked, not for this RfA, but for his past history and subsequent post to Jimbos' talk page.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 23:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.